On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Francesco PADOVANI < francesco.padov...@bticino.it> wrote:
> Hi Martyn, > > Thanks a lot for this! > > It could save us just in time... I hope so. > > As soon as I can, I'll try to build artemis from your last commit and make > some tests. > I've created a snapshot build you can test with: https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT/apache-artemis-1.6.0-20170209.161917-15-bin.zip Please let me know how you get on. Thanks > Francesco > > ________________________________ > From: Martyn Taylor <mtay...@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 1:22:52 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: ARTEMIS: bad-performance behaviour after 7-10 days of usage > > Francesco, > > I think I've identified the cause of this problem. There were two issues > which are now fixed as part of: > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1002 > > I'll get these fixes cherry-picked onto Artemis 1.x stream. > > I plan on doing a 1.5.3 (with these changes included) within the next > couple of days. > > Cheers > Martyn > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:33 AM, francesco81 < > francesco.padov...@bticino.it> > wrote: > > > Hi Martyn, > > I'll be happy to enjoy the IRC chat as soon as I can. > > Effectively, your words about the "treating as new subscription" would > > explain the issue with retained messages. > > However there's still something that I don't understand: for example why > > also the non-retained messages are resent on resubscription. Regardless > if > > retained or not, it seems that all messages persist on queue (or, in case > > of > > retained, they persist on address and one more reference is added on > queue > > at each resubscription... I don't know, I'm trying to guess) and are > never > > discarded. > > How are they managed by artemis? In a scenario where clients never > connect > > with "cleanSession=false" (that is our usecase), I thought: > > - non-retained messages are removed from address (and references from > > queues) once they are consumed by clients (or immediatly if no client is > > connected). > > - retained messages are removed from address when a new one arrives (and > > the > > reference to the new one substitutes the previous on the queue). > > Is not so? I'm wrong somewhere? > > > > Again, thanks for your patience. > > > > Francesco > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > > nabble.com/ARTEMIS-bad-performance-behaviour-after-7-10-days-of-usage- > > tp4721272p4721678.html > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > ________________________________ > > Ce message, ainsi que tous les fichiers joints ? ce message, peuvent > contenir des informations sensibles et/ ou confidentielles ne devant pas > ?tre divulgu?es. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire de ce message (ou que > vous recevez ce message par erreur), nous vous remercions de le notifier > imm?diatement ? son exp?diteur, et de d?truire ce message. Toute copie, > divulgation, modification, utilisation ou diffusion, non autoris?e, directe > ou indirecte, de tout ou partie de ce message, est strictement interdite. > > > This e-mail, and any document attached hereby, may contain confidential > and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or > have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately > and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized, direct or indirect, copying, > disclosure, distribution or other use of the material or parts thereof is > strictly forbidden. >
