Francesco, I think I've identified the cause of this problem. There were two issues which are now fixed as part of: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1002
I'll get these fixes cherry-picked onto Artemis 1.x stream. I plan on doing a 1.5.3 (with these changes included) within the next couple of days. Cheers Martyn On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:33 AM, francesco81 <francesco.padov...@bticino.it> wrote: > Hi Martyn, > I'll be happy to enjoy the IRC chat as soon as I can. > Effectively, your words about the "treating as new subscription" would > explain the issue with retained messages. > However there's still something that I don't understand: for example why > also the non-retained messages are resent on resubscription. Regardless if > retained or not, it seems that all messages persist on queue (or, in case > of > retained, they persist on address and one more reference is added on queue > at each resubscription... I don't know, I'm trying to guess) and are never > discarded. > How are they managed by artemis? In a scenario where clients never connect > with "cleanSession=false" (that is our usecase), I thought: > - non-retained messages are removed from address (and references from > queues) once they are consumed by clients (or immediatly if no client is > connected). > - retained messages are removed from address when a new one arrives (and > the > reference to the new one substitutes the previous on the queue). > Is not so? I'm wrong somewhere? > > Again, thanks for your patience. > > Francesco > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/ARTEMIS-bad-performance-behaviour-after-7-10-days-of-usage- > tp4721272p4721678.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
