This is the first I'd heard of a replicated KahaDB implementation. I'd heard of multi-KahaDB (mKahaDB), but that's multiple KahaDB databases on a single broker (split by destination) rather than replicated. Maybe someone else can provide more info...
On Oct 5, 2016 1:51 AM, "mlange" <mla...@anwb.nl> wrote: > thanks for providing a good idea of what to expect; yet I think it's good > to > be aware of this. > I did notice upon searching that there has been done some work to get > Kahadb > replicating; is that completely abandoned or is it still something that > might get implemented (in a somewhat near future) I think it's a great idea > to have the database replicating, to reduce the added complexity of shared > storage (which may itself fail, so needs to have it's own fault tolerance) > > I'll explore what other options are available and work well. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ReplicatedLevelDB-corruption-tp4716831p4717517.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
