thanks for providing a good idea of what to expect; yet I think it's good to be aware of this. I did notice upon searching that there has been done some work to get Kahadb replicating; is that completely abandoned or is it still something that might get implemented (in a somewhat near future) I think it's a great idea to have the database replicating, to reduce the added complexity of shared storage (which may itself fail, so needs to have it's own fault tolerance)
I'll explore what other options are available and work well. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ReplicatedLevelDB-corruption-tp4716831p4717517.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
