> I was trying to do similar things with data replication provider, but found > the remaining messages were not processed by the newly elected HA singleton > provider, and seemed to be lost. I am not sure if this is doable.
You'll have to go into more detail here for me to help further. A full description of the use-case, configuration, expected outcome, and actual outcome would be a good place to start. For the most part the semantics of shared-store and replication are the same, but there are places where this is not true because (surprise!) the implementations are different. I'm not sure you've run into one of those places because I'm not totally clear on what exactly you're doing. I mentioned this on the Wildfly forum thread [1] you opened about this issue, but I suppose it bears repeating. You're mixing the Wildfly application server's implementation of HA singleton with Artemis' implementation of HA, and Artemis doesn't have a notion of HA singleton. You might be better of splitting Artemis from the application server so each can be configured as necessary. Justin [1] https://developer.jboss.org/thread/271845 ----- Original Message ----- From: "wwang2016" <wayne.w...@impactmobile.com> To: users@activemq.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 7:45:29 AM Subject: Re: How to configure colocated backup servers for data replication approach Hi Justin, I was able to test the scenario with collocated shared-store approach with two wildfly instances which are set up as HA singleton (only one wildfly will be active at anytime). The following is the configuration wildfly #1 (master1 activemq + slave1 activemq) wildfly #2 (master2 activemq + slave2 activemq) The directories for master1 activemq are referenced by slave2 activemq and the directories for master2 activemq are referenced by slave1 activemq. When I start up these two wildfly instances in order, the one that was started up earlier will be HA singleton provider, and the other will be standby. I was able to test HA for messaging by shutting down the current HA singleton provider while it is in the process of processing messages (the remaining messages will be processed by the newly elected HA singleton provider). I was trying to do similar things with data replication provider, but found the remaining messages were not processed by the newly elected HA singleton provider, and seemed to be lost. I am not sure if this is doable. Thanks, Wayne -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-configure-colocated-backup-servers-for-data-replication-approach-tp4715415p4715445.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
