Hi Justin, I was not clear of the benefits of setting up a colocated backup servers with data replication approach.
If I set up master activemq server and slave activemq server in the same wildfly instance, then the messages will be copied from master to slave? That does not seem to be a useful feature since you would like the messages to be copied between wildfly instances to support HA for messaging. The only scenario I can imagine is that for data replication, we set up the following: Wildfly #1 (master activemq.1 + slave activemq.1) Wildfly #2 (master activemq.2 + slave activemq.2) Where master activemq.1 pairs with slave activemq.2 and master activemq.2 pairs with slave activemq.1. This way, if wildfly #1 is down, the slave activemq.2 will get a copy of master activemq.1. But then the messages in slave activemq.2 will still not be accessible since it is master activemq.2 that is active. I can see the benefit of setting up colocated backup servers with shared-store, but not with data replication. Thanks, Wayne -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-configure-colocated-backup-servers-for-data-replication-approach-tp4715415p4715417.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
