Another thing I'd say a little bit tongue in cheek is when it comes to 
use-cases; Why?
I see a lot of different use-cases and "unique" problems, usually the problem 
is that
being unique is the problem....

/je
 
On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com> wrote:

> lol i don't think there is magic to learning this stuff *fast* :) if you
> stumble upon some magic beans, or a refreshingly magical drink, then
> please, please, please point me to it :)
> 
> activemq is a fairly complex piece of server software. time and experience
> cannot be substituted.
> 
> your best bet is to grab someone who knows linux and networking a little, a
> good JVM profiler (yourkit), and Rob/Dejan's book, and figure out where
> your  bottlenecks are. If you've figured out where the bottlenecks are,
> then come back here and we can give some suggestions for configuration
> tweaks.
> 
> paid support is also available: http://activemq.apache.org/support.html
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:52 AM, HellKnight <hellkni...@foxmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>    Never had any experience about servers, clusters , linux OS ,
>> enterprise
>> level software etc before(Actually I mean when I was at university).It
>> really suffers when I encounter some problems and can not come up with any
>> ideas to find its cause step by step and resolve it at last, not to mention
>> bosses getting mad and deadlines ahead, haha.
>>   I wonder whether there is any way to learn these things fast, reading
>> blogs/articles/books seems to be a bad idea because I read a lot about
>> ActiveMQ but I still can not come up with satisfactory solutions when
>> something wrong about broker or new requirements/use case comes to me .
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Poor-performance-while-using-virtual-topic-mode-tp4672867p4672990.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Christian Posta*
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> twitter: @christianposta

Reply via email to