Hi, Thanks i added the log4j for all components under org.apache.activemq. Hopefully i can see something useful.
On 12 July 2013 00:21, Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > Add logging configuration to turn on logging for the bridge. > > e.g., > > to your log4j.properties, add > > > log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridgeSupport=DEBUG > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Praveen Bysani <praveen.ii...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I found the following lines in the subscriber log > > > > | org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor | DEBUG | 2013-07-11 > > 07:34:44,384 | 30000 ms elapsed since last read check. > > | org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor | DEBUG | 2013-07-11 > > 07:34:44,384 | > > org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor$2@61726a5c9999 > > ms elapsed since last write check. > > > > I have disabled the inactivity period in the broker connection url by > > setting maxInactivityDuration to 0. Does it have anything to do with > > messages not being received ? > > > > On 11 July 2013 12:18, Praveen Bysani <praveen.ii...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Christian, > > > > > > Thanks for your input. But i have little idea of what those terms mean. > > > Could you elaborate please. > > > > > > > > > On 10 July 2013 21:06, Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Your best bet would be to set logging to debug on the network bridge > > >> (DemandForwardingBridgeSupport) and possibly the RegionBroker to see > > what > > >> is happening. > > >> > > >> On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Praveen Bysani wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi, > > >> > I have the following setup in my project, > > >> > > > >> > 1. multiple producers (p1,p2,p3) in Hongkong region sending > > variable > > >> > size non-persistent messages to a topic t1 on the broker (b1) in > > >> > Phillippines region > > >> > 2. p1,p2 and p3 send messages frequently (~1 second) > > >> > 3. each message has a time to live of 30 seconds > > >> > 4. a tcp network bridge from b1 to a new broker b2 in HK region > > >> > 5. consumers c1 in hongkong and c2 in europe subscribed to b2 > > through > > >> > ssl and a consumer c3 subscribed to t1 on b1 through tcp > > >> > > > >> > I don't see the same amount of messages received across c1, c2 and > c3. > > >> The > > >> > number of messages received is in the following order c3 > c1 > c2. > I > > >> use > > >> > the default settings for prefetch values and *vmCursor *for > > >> > *pendingSubscriberPolicy > > >> > *and *strictOrderDisptachpolicy*. > > >> > > > >> > While i understand there could be delays in passing the message to > > these > > >> > consumers as c3 could be slow consumer and c1 is fast, shouldn't the > > >> > message eventually be received to all consumers of a topic. Why do i > > see > > >> > different volumes of messages across different consumers ? Someone > > >> please > > >> > help me understand what is going on !! > > >> > > > >> > Another strange thing is after a while, there are no messages > received > > >> by > > >> > c2 for a very long period. I suppose it is due to the prefetch size > ? > > >> Since > > >> > i am using a non persistent topic, the default value is quite high > > >> > (according to activemq documentation), which again baffles me if > that > > is > > >> > really the reason. > > >> > -- > > >> > Regards, > > >> > Praveen Bysani > > >> > http://www.praveenbysani.com > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> *Christian Posta* > > >> http://www.christianposta.com/blog > > >> twitter: @christianposta > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Praveen Bysani > > > http://www.praveenbysani.com > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Praveen Bysani > > http://www.praveenbysani.com > > > > > > -- > *Christian Posta* > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > twitter: @christianposta > -- Regards, Praveen Bysani http://www.praveenbysani.com
