Add logging configuration to turn on logging for the bridge. e.g.,
to your log4j.properties, add log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridgeSupport=DEBUG On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Praveen Bysani <praveen.ii...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > I found the following lines in the subscriber log > > | org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor | DEBUG | 2013-07-11 > 07:34:44,384 | 30000 ms elapsed since last read check. > | org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor | DEBUG | 2013-07-11 > 07:34:44,384 | > org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor$2@61726a5c9999 > ms elapsed since last write check. > > I have disabled the inactivity period in the broker connection url by > setting maxInactivityDuration to 0. Does it have anything to do with > messages not being received ? > > On 11 July 2013 12:18, Praveen Bysani <praveen.ii...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Christian, > > > > Thanks for your input. But i have little idea of what those terms mean. > > Could you elaborate please. > > > > > > On 10 July 2013 21:06, Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Your best bet would be to set logging to debug on the network bridge > >> (DemandForwardingBridgeSupport) and possibly the RegionBroker to see > what > >> is happening. > >> > >> On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Praveen Bysani wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > I have the following setup in my project, > >> > > >> > 1. multiple producers (p1,p2,p3) in Hongkong region sending > variable > >> > size non-persistent messages to a topic t1 on the broker (b1) in > >> > Phillippines region > >> > 2. p1,p2 and p3 send messages frequently (~1 second) > >> > 3. each message has a time to live of 30 seconds > >> > 4. a tcp network bridge from b1 to a new broker b2 in HK region > >> > 5. consumers c1 in hongkong and c2 in europe subscribed to b2 > through > >> > ssl and a consumer c3 subscribed to t1 on b1 through tcp > >> > > >> > I don't see the same amount of messages received across c1, c2 and c3. > >> The > >> > number of messages received is in the following order c3 > c1 > c2. I > >> use > >> > the default settings for prefetch values and *vmCursor *for > >> > *pendingSubscriberPolicy > >> > *and *strictOrderDisptachpolicy*. > >> > > >> > While i understand there could be delays in passing the message to > these > >> > consumers as c3 could be slow consumer and c1 is fast, shouldn't the > >> > message eventually be received to all consumers of a topic. Why do i > see > >> > different volumes of messages across different consumers ? Someone > >> please > >> > help me understand what is going on !! > >> > > >> > Another strange thing is after a while, there are no messages received > >> by > >> > c2 for a very long period. I suppose it is due to the prefetch size ? > >> Since > >> > i am using a non persistent topic, the default value is quite high > >> > (according to activemq documentation), which again baffles me if that > is > >> > really the reason. > >> > -- > >> > Regards, > >> > Praveen Bysani > >> > http://www.praveenbysani.com > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> *Christian Posta* > >> http://www.christianposta.com/blog > >> twitter: @christianposta > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Praveen Bysani > > http://www.praveenbysani.com > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Praveen Bysani > http://www.praveenbysani.com > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
