Hi, you can also use REST API if you need to embed the broker in an existing web server
http://activemq.apache.org/rest.html Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Erik Martino Hansen <erik.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I looked a bit more into it. The apache solution does not fit our product. > But it seems to me that the new websocket+stomp feature in the upcoming > activemq would make port sharing possible if activemq is embedded in the > jetty instance and one uses a stomp+websocket client on the java client > side. Right? > > Would it be possible to implement the native activemq protocol on top of a > websocket to get all the activemq features. This will ensure that a service > and activemq could hide behind a single port? > > /erik > > > Erik Martino Hansen wrote: >> >> Is it possible to let activemq share a port (80 or 8080) with a servlet >> engine like Jetty or Tomcat? So that a single port on a single server >> serves standard http requests and jms broker communication. >> >> The examples I could find seems to assume that the activemq broker owns >> the port. >> >> If that is not possible could you point me to another protocol that let me >> efficiently push messages from a web server to a java client. I have found >> examples on java server to flex (blazeds), java server to html+javascript >> (atmosphere) but not java server to java client. >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Port-sharing-with-servlet-engine-tp29306994p29322673.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
