I looked a bit more into it. The apache solution does not fit our product. But it seems to me that the new websocket+stomp feature in the upcoming activemq would make port sharing possible if activemq is embedded in the jetty instance and one uses a stomp+websocket client on the java client side. Right?
Would it be possible to implement the native activemq protocol on top of a websocket to get all the activemq features. This will ensure that a service and activemq could hide behind a single port? /erik Erik Martino Hansen wrote: > > Is it possible to let activemq share a port (80 or 8080) with a servlet > engine like Jetty or Tomcat? So that a single port on a single server > serves standard http requests and jms broker communication. > > The examples I could find seems to assume that the activemq broker owns > the port. > > If that is not possible could you point me to another protocol that let me > efficiently push messages from a web server to a java client. I have found > examples on java server to flex (blazeds), java server to html+javascript > (atmosphere) but not java server to java client. > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Port-sharing-with-servlet-engine-tp29306994p29322673.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
