yep!
On 22 Jul 2009, at 17:36, Dan Tran wrote:
will fixed at activemq side?
-D
rajdavies wrote:
ooh - ok - I think we need to adjust something ;)
On 22 Jul 2009, at 16:54, Dan Tran wrote:
is it better if it is at DEBUG level? Or it really mean we must to
adjust
the memory accordingly. otherwise the log file will be full of these
messages.
This is new in 5.3 SNAPSHOT
-D
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WARN--org.apache.activemq.usage.Usage----%3CMemory-usage-is-now-at-100-%3E.--Is-it-nessessary--tp24609194p24609194.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Rob Davies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WARN--org.apache.activemq.usage.Usage----%3CMemory-usage-is-now-at-100-%3E.--Is-it-nessessary--tp24609194p24609939.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Rob Davies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
