James.Strachan wrote:
>
> 2008/12/11 mmocnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>> James.Strachan wrote:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>> though I think putting redelivered messages at the tail of the queue
>>> (so its dispatched last) is what you want - so resending the message
>>> rather than rolling back & closing is probably more suitable
>>>
>> Yes, that is what I want to achieve, but if I do it that way I'm loosing
>> the
>> benefits of redelivery by ActiveMQ:
>> - RedeliveryDelay (with exponentialBackoff)
>> - RedeliveryLimit
>
> But those don't matter if the next message you are processing is a
> totally different message?
>
> --
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com/
>
>
Well, not for the next message, but for the message I want to resend.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rollback-and-acknowledge-tp20934209p20956424.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
