James.Strachan wrote: > >> [...] > though I think putting redelivered messages at the tail of the queue > (so its dispatched last) is what you want - so resending the message > rather than rolling back & closing is probably more suitable > Yes, that is what I want to achieve, but if I do it that way I'm loosing the benefits of redelivery by ActiveMQ: - RedeliveryDelay (with exponentialBackoff) - RedeliveryLimit
If you can think of any way I could use those features without implementing them myself, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Marko -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rollback-and-acknowledge-tp20934209p20956173.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
