carbon60 wrote:
>
> But the master/slave setup seems to cause a bottleneck with a single
> broker, no? I would rather have multiple brokers sharing the load in a
> peer-to-peer fashion.
>
I believe that this config should work:
<broker xmlns="http://activemq.org/config/1.0"; brokerName="broker1"
id="broker1" useJmx="true" persistent="true"
dataDirectory="${data.basepath}/messages">
<networkConnectors>
<!-- by default just auto discover the other brokers -->
<networkConnector name="default-nc" uri="multicast://default"/>
</networkConnectors>
<transportConnectors>
<transportConnector uri="tcp://localhost:61818?trace=true"
discoveryUri="multicast://default"/>
</transportConnectors>
</broker>
All the brokers will have their own data directory. This should give me
reliability and performance, I hope.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
A.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Configuration-Confusion-tp15982539s2354p16018585.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
