carbon60 wrote: > > On 11-Mar-08, at 10:01 AM, James Strachan wrote: >>> I need to configure my brokers to fault-tolerant in a two-node >>> cluster. I'm configuring this directly inside Spring. >>> >>> I believe I need to use some form of auto-discovery, journaled >>> persistence and clustering, but after reading most of the >>> documentation I'm not clear on the exact setup I should be using. >> >> So for clustering you need master/slave which ensures messages are >> stored on different physical devices to protect against loss >> http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html > > So a network of brokers sharing the load is not appropriate in my > situation? >
>From the documentation, it seems like the peer:// URI is what I need? I tried that in my current config and received a "This protocol does not support being bound" IOException. Thanks, A. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Configuration-Confusion-tp15982539s2354p16009375.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
