Rob, Do you have a date for the 5.0 release?
cheers </jima> Rob Davies wrote:
It was decided that because of the need to use JDK 5.0 - version 4.2 should be re-named as 5.0 - so no difference at all ;)On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Jim Alateras wrote:I was just wondering whether the only difference between the two versions was that the 5.0 was target for JDK 5.x.cheers </jima>
