If it does, please feel free to file a issue ticket against 2.1.0. * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW/fixforversion/21794
-Ted. On 10/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We did all of the things described in the performance-tuning tips. > But we've been using intensively ajax tag (datetime picker and > autocompleter). > Theses two tags force us to include the killing head tag. > When we removed them (removing the head tag in the same time) our pages > are faster (a least 5 times). > > I think that if the head tag will still kill performance on 2.1. It should > be told in the performance tip. > > It will surely help posting a link to a temporary struts 2.1 version. > > thank in advance. > Meissa > > > > > "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Envoyé par : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 04/10/2007 13:08 > Veuillez répondre à > "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> > > > A > "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> > cc > > Objet > Re: struts 2.1 beta > > > > > > > For performance problems, be sure to follow the advice on this page. > > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/performance-tuning.html > > If you do all of these things, and still consider the performance > unacceptable, then I doubt that Struts 2.1 will make a startling > difference. If performance is the key concern, then Struts 1 is still > the best choice. I also understand that Tapestry performs well. > > If it helps, I'll post a link to a temporary Struts 2.1 snapshot, with > all the dependencies, on the developers list. As soon as XWork 2.1.0 > is available, we'll roll a Struts 2.1.0 distribution for testing, > which should be "real soon now". > > * http://www.nabble.com/Struts---Dev-f205.html > > -- HTH, Ted > Attend "Migrating to Ajax" at ApacheCon US 2007: > * http://us.apachecon.com/us2007/program/talk/1883 > > > On 9/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That's exactly what I wanted. I new complete un-released version. > > But at this time, I'm giving up. To tired. > > I'll restart using struts when a version without the dreadfull > performance > > impact will be around. > > > > I hope that we'll get it before the end of the century. > > > > Meissa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 25/09/2007 14:56 > > Veuillez répondre à > > "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> > > > > > > A > > Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org> > > cc > > > > Objet > > Re: struts 2.1 beta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want a complete build of an un-released version > > then AFAIK you need to build it from source. The > > repository contains the dependent libraries. > > > > The nightly builds are just that, builds, not > > distributions (again, AFAIK). > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I just need to grab the nightly version WITH > > > DEPENDANTS LIBRAIRIES if it exist. > > > the link below > > > > > > http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/building-the-framework-from-source.html > > > drive me to that one > > > > > http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/nightlies/2.x/ > > > > > > No librairies. > > > Meissa > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > 25/09/2007 14:28 > > > Veuillez répondre à > > > "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > A > > > Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org> > > > cc > > > > > > Objet > > > Re: struts 2.1 beta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Oleg Mikheev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dave Newton wrote: > > > > >> I have just renamed it to struts2-core.jar and > > > > >> replaced in my application that was working > > > with > > > > >> 2.0.9 version. > > > > > > > > > > You can't just randomly replace libraries. > > > > > > > > You can replace 2.0.8 with 2.0.9, but you can't > > > > replace 2.0.9 with 2.1.0 > > > > > > You certainly *could*, but it would still make me > > > nervous w/o testing since XWork revved also... I > > > guess > > > I always think that dropping in a new library > > > revision > > > w/o keeping track of library dependencies is risky. > > > > > > d. > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > L'integrite de ce message n'etant pas assuree sur > > > internet, Natixis ne peut etre tenu responsable de > > > son contenu. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non > > > autorisee est interdite. Si vous n'etes pas > > > destinataire de ce message, merci de le detruire et > > > d'avertir l'expediteur. > > > Ensemble, faisons un geste pour l'environnement : > > > n'imprimons nos mails que si necessaire > > > > > > The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed > > > on the Internet. Natixis can not therefore be > > > considered responsible for the contents. Any > > > unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If > > > you are not the intended recipient of this message, > > > then please delete it and notify the sender. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > L'integrite de ce message n'etant pas assuree sur internet, Natixis ne > peut etre tenu responsable de son contenu. Toute utilisation ou diffusion > non autorisee est interdite. Si vous n'etes pas destinataire de ce > message, merci de le detruire et d'avertir l'expediteur. > > Ensemble, faisons un geste pour l'environnement : n'imprimons nos mails > que si necessaire > > > > The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. > Natixis can not therefore be considered responsible for the contents. Any > unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient of this message, then please delete it and notify the > sender. > > > > > -- > HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > L'integrite de ce message n'etant pas assuree sur internet, Natixis ne peut > etre tenu responsable de son contenu. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non > autorisee est interdite. Si vous n'etes pas destinataire de ce message, merci > de le detruire et d'avertir l'expediteur. > Ensemble, faisons un geste pour l'environnement : n'imprimons nos mails que > si necessaire > > The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. Natixis > can not therefore be considered responsible for the contents. Any > unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, then please delete it and notify the sender. > -- HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
