Okay, Dave?!? I guess you are right after all: non-public open-source projects are really quite normal, right? Keep truckin'!
On 3/25/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dakota Jack wrote: > > This is going to be one of my all time favorites. Brought a HUGE grin > to my > > face. > > > > Weird, but okay. > > If you are addressing the apparent dichotomy with "publicly-accessible" > and "open-source" then you probably just don't know very much, but I'll > talk slowly, as there are two different reasons I chose to risk you > being an asshole: > > 1) Open-source roots, multiplicity of commiters, not-yet-released (and, > I suppose, may never be at this point, but who knows) > 2) Pre-released, ground-up effort > > Multiple projects, unknown future. Labeled as open-source but relatively > small community and for the forseeable future (3-6 months?) nothing will > be publicly available. > > Dave > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
