On 3/16/06, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why cant the master server provide the information, as i assume that
> > some form of request is being made via a socket or otherwise to
> > register the client? Even if no you can still do what you need by
> > creating a socket or url connection to the master, and have the master
> > send the details back.
> >
> > A bit like when folk ask me for my mobile phone number i never
> > remember it.. So i get them to give me their number and i call them
> > and hang up to give them my number..
> >
> > It all seems a bit promiscuous for me, but it should work just fine..
>
> No, because when in the webserver you have to unidirectional lines
> instead of one bidirectional as in the mobile phone. Your caller
> number is not the same as your callee number :-)

Shit .. yeah, Oh well it was worth a go.. Still cant see why the
master needs to request the gimp's url anyhow.. Could just send the
/someaction.do?foo=bar back to the client in the response, at runtime
(when the relevant actions are called). The master need never know
anything about the gimp other than what it needs to respond.. send it
back to the client and let the client do its thing..

still promiscuous and don't really see why it needs doing in a plugin..

>
> >
> > Mark
>
> regards
> Leon
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to