Hello Juan, On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 01:33, Juan Antonio Moreno Carmona <jam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all. > > I think it's a good idea. I have an openmeetings installation that we > could use to do those tests. But I have to count on you. I have prepared a > room with a pdf document and a sound file (an .ogg file). The pdf document > is the third chapter of Hermann Melville's book 'Moby Dick' and the audio > file is read in English. > > I can send an invitation by email to anyone who confirms that they are > interested in attending this presentation. The more we are, the more useful > the test will be. > Are we going to test room stability only? What version do you have installed? > I propose next Saturday as the appropriate date and could open the room at > the following times, (all GMT) 8:00, 11:00, 16:00 and 19:00. The audio file > lasts approximately 35 minutes. I am at GMT + 2 (CET). > My vacation is over so I can't participate during day-time, 16:00GMT is preferable for me, most probably I can participate in "silent mode" > What do you think about? > We can even do a test this afternoon at eight, in about an hour and a > half, with users who can attend at that time. > > Regards. > El 14/5/20 a las 1:03, seba.wag...@gmail.com escribió: > > How are we doing in terms of Load Testing ? > > I don't mind so much feature completeness or 100% replicating what was in > 4.x. > > But I am mindful of the backlash in terms of being production ready if we > have issues in scaling up to 100+ concurrent users. > > Do we have any positive results/feedback/scenarios on that ? > Can we do anything to de-risk this and confirm we are ready for production > ? > > Are there any users on this list that can help us and that can run a low > risk scenario with 100+ users in a presentation conference room ? > > Thanks, > Seb > > Sebastian Wagner > Director Arrakeen Solutions > http://arrakeen-solutions.co.nz/ > > <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/da4e8828-743d-4968-af6f-49033f10d60a/public_url> > <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/b7e709c6-aa87-4b02-9faf-099038475e36/public_url> > > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 08:55, K. Kamhamea <kamha...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Please can someone explain? >> I understand that SIP has something to do with IP telephones, but what >> does that mean to OM functionality? >> Best K. >> >> Am Mi., 13. Mai 2020 um 18:15 Uhr schrieb R. Scholz < >> rene.sch...@abakus-edv-systems.de>: >> >>> Hello Maxim, >>> >>> at this moment two things are important for me: >>> - calling a room directly with room-name >>> - SIP-support >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> René >>> >>> >>> Am 13.05.2020 um 17:59 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 22:55, Rohrbach, Gerald < >>> g.rohrb...@funkegruppe.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Maxim, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> cool, you are coming forward… >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> SIP Next Release means 6.0.0? >>>> >>> >>> This need to be discussed separately, but I would say 5.1.0 :) >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Gerald >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Von:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] >>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2020 17:47 >>>> *An:* Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org> >>>> *Betreff:* [DISCUSSION] next release >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Today I've noticed we already addressed 41 issue for M5 >>>> >>>> I would like to perform next release as soon as current `master` will >>>> be even more stable >>>> >>>> And release it as "5.0.0" (NOT 5.0.0-M5) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I plan to include >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2297 >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2236 >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2217 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> to upcoming release as well >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> there is no ETA yet due to >>>> >>>> 1) we still have reports regarding stability >>>> >>>> 2) we are waiting for Apache Wicket release >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> please let me know if you see other blockers :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> SIP most probably will go to the next release >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Maxim >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Maxim >>> >>> >>> -- Best regards, Maxim
