Hello Peter, On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 03:24, R. Scholz <rene.sch...@abakus-edv-systems.de> wrote:
> Hello, > > conferences with public authorities I had repeatedly problems to connect > them. > I think its possible that the reason is a restrictive firewall-management. > > What do you mean? It is better to configure OM on port 443? Or port 80 > (with a separate domain/subdomain) > so this people can access without problems? > It is always better to use well-known ports But I guess your users can access Web-interface, but have issues with audio/video, am I right? If so there is not much can be done :( OM and KMS can be set-up to use port 443 (we had successful report on this) TURN main port can be set to be 80 BUT this will not be enough due to TURN requires multiple additional UDP ports :((( This need to be investigated Better with remote access to the "trouble client" :(( > > Another question: Have anybody made a test with a chinese university? Is > it possible to connect from ther to a OM-server outside China? > We do have Chinese users in JIRA from time to time, but no reports Chinese Great Firewall is very restrictive, some years ago it block Maven central repository ... :( > > With best regards, > > René > > > > > > > > > > > Am 05.05.2020 um 07:58 schrieb Peter-Otto Weber: > > I just got in first contact with „bigbluebutton“. > > > > It seems to be very similar to openmeetings but – as i suggested before – > has a better implementation of video arrangement. > > > > All videos automatically were arranged above the whitboard – i like it. > > > > What i wonder is ,why open meetings needs to use specific https port and > bigbluebutton does not? > > > > The main problem is with customers having a firewall allowing only 80/443. > We had scheduled a meeting with customers that had to be canceled due to > networking / firewall problems. > > > > Using 80/443 like on bigbluebutton would make everything much easier? Is > this possible? > > > > Best wishes > > > > POW > > > -- Best regards, Maxim
