Hello Andre, which guide are you referring to?

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Andre Wruszczak <wruszc...@web.de> wrote:

> Hey,
>
>
>
> I’ve made a similar mistake (not changing the context path name) I think
> the guides should be updated, telling you to change “localhost:5080” to
> your servers name if needed, as clients can’t connect to the screen sharing
> app otherwise.
>
> Or write a more exhaustive description in the configuration for the
> context path. In my opinion this would help greatly ( this rather small
> mistake ) took me quite a while to figure out!
>
> Cheers
> Andre
>
>
>
> *Von:* Tech Developer [mailto:simatechdevelo...@gmail.com]
> *Gesendet:* Saturday, July 23, 2016 8:17 AM
> *An:* user@openmeetings.apache.org
> *Betreff:* Re: Share / Record Screen Issue
>
>
>
> Hi,
>    Thank you for your reply, the above issue resolved. The error occured
> as I didn't change the context path name. Now I am able to access 
> "Openmeetings
> Screen Sharing Applet" in both the openmeetings.
>
>    You mentioned that "we need two different port numbers, one for each
> instance of the OM application to listen to at HTTP level, as well as RTMP
> level."
>
> But am able to run both the open meetings at the same time using the same
> port number without any 404 errors.
>
> Now, please tell me whether Is it mandatory to apply two different port
> numbers for the two different open meetings ?
> If it is mandatory, it will be helpful if you could also tell me how to
> apply the information in the configuration files i.e. (Thus, as an example,
> if OM-1 listens to HTTP port 5080, OM-2 could listen on 5079. Again, if
> OM-1 listens to RTMP  port 1935, OM-2 could listen on 1936.)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Susheel Jalali <
> susheel.jal...@coscend.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Tech Developer,
>
> Are you running both OM-1 and OM-2 concurrently (at same time) on the same
> server?
>
> If so you will notice that while the first one gives sign-in page, the
> second OM-2 does not even start and gives HTTP 404.
>
> You need two different port numbers, one for each instance of the OM
> application to listen to at HTTP level, as well as RTMP level.
> Thus, as an example, if OM-1 listens to HTTP port 5080, OM-2 could listen
> on 5079.
> Again, if OM-1 listens to RTMP  port 1935, OM-2 could listen on 1936.
>
> You need to modify the configuration files as mentioned in installation
> instructions.
>
> For launching the recording application, you need to have supported
> version of Java (7 or 8 usually), then allow the download of JNLP file to
> complete, ensure you have the coorrect URL with port number
> added to your Java Control Panel Security settings and then launch the
> JNLP file, and agree to the security warning (risk), then RUN it.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> Susheel Jalali
> Coscend Communications Solutions
> www.Coscend.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail
> Messages from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at:
> http://www.Coscend.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html
>
>
>
> On 07/22/16 10:49, Tech Developer wrote:
>
> Hi sir,
>
>    I have installed 2 openmmetings in server
> 1.  http://www.tutorreal.com:5080/platform/signin
> 2.  http://www.tutorreal.com:5080/webmeetings/
>
>      For 2nd om i am able to get recording option in webinar and
> conference rooms also.Screen Sharing Applet opened - Here I have no problem.
>
>      But I have an issue in Share / Record option of Webinar, Conference
> rooms in 1st om. I have attached log file and screen shot of this issue.
> Recently I changed the name of openmeetings as platform. So Application can
> be accessed from here http://www.tutorreal.com:5080/platform
>
> But when we click on the screenshare / record option in 1st OM it tries to
> open the "Openmeetings Screen Sharing Applet" using the below url
>
> http://www.tutorreal.com:5080/openmeetings/screenshare/openmeetings-screenshare-3.1.1.jar
>
>             How could i solve this issue? Please let me know
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to