you can create Wiki page [1] (ask for additional karma) or create an issue and attach your proposal to it [2] or send it to dev list :)
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENMEETINGS/Index [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Daria Mikhaylova <d.mikhayl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am totally newcomer, but will try to understand how contributions is > working in OM community (also test page you've gave me link) and try to > dive in and do my best! > thanks again > > On 2/11/2015 18:57, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > We accepting documentation contributions ;) > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Daria Mikhaylova <d.mikhayl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Wow thank you, Maxim, it's exactly what we were looking for and >> searching how to do it. >> Seems in new documentation there is no mention of this possibility, but >> now I've found it. >> Thanks again for help! >> daria >> >> On 2/11/2015 09:46, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >> >> Unfortunately network is the bottleneck for video conferences >> One can play with parameters in config.xml to decrease video quality and >> reduce bandwidth per user >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Daria Mikhaylova < >> d.mikhayl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Good morning! >>> So we are going quite well, we have virtual server 2-core 2GB RAM (VPS >>> digital ocean) >>> and for now maximum we did conference with 6 participants and smallest >>> video, 4 of them were in Italy, where internet connection is really really >>> bad. >>> >>> On 2/11/2015 09:19, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>> >>> Here is the message: http://markmail.org/message/k7pwhdn2vdbzkgmy (you >>> can try to use google translate) >>> >>> here are the highlights: >>> 0) they have bad performance with CentOS 6.5 VM >>> so they got >>> 1) physical server HP DL380 G5 with 4GB RAM and 2x 4-core CPU Intel >>> Xeon X5450 (3 ГГц). Gigabit Ethernet >>> 2) CentOS 6.6 Final x64 >>> 3) OM 3.0.4-SNAPSHOT with all dependencies and third-party tools >>> >>> as a result: >>> 1) CPU was loaded up to 55% >>> 2) Outgoing network utilization on server was 71 Mbit/sec >>> 3) 15 participants were on network with bandwidth 50 Mbit/sec and it was >>> totally utilized >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:04 AM, OpenAr-IT Soluciones < >>> opena...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Maxim, do you know how the Russian team tunned the server?, do you >>>> have the configuration parameters they used? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks! will ask >>>>> >>>>> Actually we have report in Russian mailing list about successful >>>>> conference with 18 video windows: >>>>> 16 with video 240х180 and 2 with 640х480. >>>>> They have tuned both server and network >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>>> d.mikhayl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I will try next time, we chose this video format only because were >>>>>> not sure if server can hold 5 of us. >>>>>> Yes CPU usage was high, my laptop is i3-2367M @1.40 Ghz, RAM 8 64bit >>>>>> but when testing OM, I've shut down all applications to see "pure" >>>>>> result. >>>>>> >>>>>> great! if any day you need additional testers we'll be happy to help >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/10/2015 22:27, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I saw issues with 90x120 video on Mac, can you increase the size a >>>>>> bit? (select next larger option) >>>>>> According to delay on Windows: was was CPU usage? >>>>>> We are actually starting to test audio/video and recording tomorrow >>>>>> morning (Development is performed using Ubuntu machine so I see no issues >>>>>> :( ) >>>>>> Will try to reproduce your results tomorrow morning >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>>>> d.mikhayl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, Maxim, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We've tested with 3 users and large video (640x480) with our server >>>>>>> and demo-server. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ubuntu Studio preemptive kernel 14.04 with Chrome >>>>>>> Windows 7 with Chrome/Firefox >>>>>>> 10.9.5 Mac OS Chrome/Firefox >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Results are: >>>>>>> for Ubuntu Chrome doesn't create any problem. >>>>>>> for Mac OS same, when entered with Chrome sound went a little low >>>>>>> for both of us. >>>>>>> for Windows Chrome creates delay of 6-8 sec and sound goes very bad, >>>>>>> instead Firefox doesn't give any problem, real-time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On your server is exactly the same. 8 sec delay for windows with >>>>>>> Chrome. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Last time 2 of our other participants were using Mac OS with chrome >>>>>>> and couldn't activate video (in conference total 5 users: 4 video >>>>>>> 90x120, 1 >>>>>>> audio) and sound was disappearing to one or to other. When I asked one >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> them to test later with firefox it was working, chrome still was giving >>>>>>> same error. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hope it can give you some meaningful information, >>>>>>> thank you again, >>>>>>> daria >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/10/2015 15:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks a lot, we have 3.0.4RC1 (installed there) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>>>>> d.mikhayl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OM 3.0.3 >>>>>>>> I will try on demo server today when I'll get testers together and >>>>>>>> write you back. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/10/2015 15:02, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What version of OM are you using? >>>>>>>> Cant you check if the problem reproducible on our demo server? >>>>>>>> http://om.alteametasoft.com:5080/openmeetings >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>>>>>> d.mikhayl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you Maxim for looking into it, if for you works fine, >>>>>>>>> probably there is other reason than chrome. >>>>>>>>> Yesterday I was also trying to use Chrome (from Windows) to >>>>>>>>> participate in OM with 5 other people and it was causing problems to >>>>>>>>> everyone - people were not hearing each other, room was getting >>>>>>>>> stacked, as >>>>>>>>> soon I've changed to firefox, there was no problem anymore. >>>>>>>>> Unfortunatelly I cannot provide specific steps - the only thing I >>>>>>>>> am sure, it was not problem of my internet connection and also our >>>>>>>>> server >>>>>>>>> was stable (droplet 20$). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am not expert in video/audio conferencing, is it true that if >>>>>>>>> one person has problem with bandwidth - everyone in the room suffer? >>>>>>>>> eventually if there is any setting that permit us to isolate one with >>>>>>>>> problems so others are not touched? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> thank you again! >>>>>>>>> daria >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2015 09:37, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just have tried >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Google Chrome 40.0.2214.111 (64-bit) >>>>>>>>> Mac OS X 10.9.5 (iMac) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> conference room works as expected >>>>>>>>> Maybe there are any specific steps to reproduce? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>>>>>>> d.mikhayl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> Seems that last version of google chrome 40.0.2214.111 installed >>>>>>>>>> on Mac (3 different computers) gives strange problem for users of OM, >>>>>>>>>> instead of video it shows in conference an tv-like interferences >>>>>>>>>> and sound is going on and off. >>>>>>>>>> Firefox works fine. Also previous versions were going well. >>>>>>>>>> I don't know what can be the reason, probably flash plugin, but >>>>>>>>>> if you have no time for frustration of your attendees, ask them not >>>>>>>>>> to use >>>>>>>>>> last version of Chrome. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>>> daria mikhaylova >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> WBR >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
