Wow thank you, Maxim, it's exactly what we were looking for and
searching how to do it.
Seems in new documentation there is no mention of this possibility, but
now I've found it.
Thanks again for help!
daria
On 2/11/2015 09:46, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Unfortunately network is the bottleneck for video conferences
One can play with parameters in config.xml to decrease video quality
and reduce bandwidth per user
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Daria Mikhaylova
<d.mikhayl...@gmail.com <mailto:d.mikhayl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Good morning!
So we are going quite well, we have virtual server 2-core 2GB RAM
(VPS digital ocean)
and for now maximum we did conference with 6 participants and
smallest video, 4 of them were in Italy, where internet connection
is really really bad.
On 2/11/2015 09:19, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Here is the message: http://markmail.org/message/k7pwhdn2vdbzkgmy
(you can try to use google translate)
here are the highlights:
0) they have bad performance with CentOS 6.5 VM
so they got
1) physical server HP DL380 G5 with 4GB RAM and 2x 4-core CPU
Intel Xeon X5450 (3 ГГц). Gigabit Ethernet
2) CentOS 6.6 Final x64
3) OM 3.0.4-SNAPSHOT with all dependencies and third-party tools
as a result:
1) CPU was loaded up to 55%
2) Outgoing network utilization on server was 71 Mbit/sec
3) 15 participants were on network with bandwidth 50 Mbit/sec and
it was totally utilized
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:04 AM, OpenAr-IT Soluciones
<opena...@gmail.com <mailto:opena...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Maxim, do you know how the Russian team tunned the
server?, do you have the configuration parameters they used?
Thanks in advance
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
<solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks! will ask
Actually we have report in Russian mailing list about
successful conference with 18 video windows:
16 with video 240х180 and 2 with 640х480.
They have tuned both server and network
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Daria Mikhaylova
<d.mikhayl...@gmail.com <mailto:d.mikhayl...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
I will try next time, we chose this video format only
because were not sure if server can hold 5 of us.
Yes CPU usage was high, my laptop is i3-2367M @1.40
Ghz, RAM 8 64bit
but when testing OM, I've shut down all applications
to see "pure" result.
great! if any day you need additional testers we'll
be happy to help
On 2/10/2015 22:27, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
I saw issues with 90x120 video on Mac, can you
increase the size a bit? (select next larger option)
According to delay on Windows: was was CPU usage?
We are actually starting to test audio/video and
recording tomorrow morning (Development is performed
using Ubuntu machine so I see no issues :( )
Will try to reproduce your results tomorrow morning
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Daria Mikhaylova
<d.mikhayl...@gmail.com
<mailto:d.mikhayl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi, Maxim,
We've tested with 3 users and large video
(640x480) with our server and demo-server.
Ubuntu Studio preemptive kernel 14.04 with Chrome
Windows 7 with Chrome/Firefox
10.9.5 Mac OS Chrome/Firefox
Results are:
for Ubuntu Chrome doesn't create any problem.
for Mac OS same, when entered with Chrome sound
went a little low for both of us.
for Windows Chrome creates delay of 6-8 sec and
sound goes very bad, instead Firefox doesn't
give any problem, real-time.
On your server is exactly the same. 8 sec delay
for windows with Chrome.
Last time 2 of our other participants were using
Mac OS with chrome and couldn't activate video
(in conference total 5 users: 4 video 90x120, 1
audio) and sound was disappearing to one or to
other. When I asked one of them to test later
with firefox it was working, chrome still was
giving same error.
Hope it can give you some meaningful information,
thank you again,
daria
On 2/10/2015 15:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Thanks a lot, we have 3.0.4RC1 (installed there)
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Daria
Mikhaylova <d.mikhayl...@gmail.com
<mailto:d.mikhayl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
OM 3.0.3
I will try on demo server today when I'll
get testers together and write you back.
On 2/10/2015 15:02, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
What version of OM are you using?
Cant you check if the problem reproducible
on our demo server?
http://om.alteametasoft.com:5080/openmeetings
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Daria
Mikhaylova <d.mikhayl...@gmail.com
<mailto:d.mikhayl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thank you Maxim for looking into it,
if for you works fine, probably there
is other reason than chrome.
Yesterday I was also trying to use
Chrome (from Windows) to participate
in OM with 5 other people and it was
causing problems to everyone - people
were not hearing each other, room was
getting stacked, as soon I've changed
to firefox, there was no problem anymore.
Unfortunatelly I cannot provide
specific steps - the only thing I am
sure, it was not problem of my
internet connection and also our
server was stable (droplet 20$).
I am not expert in video/audio
conferencing, is it true that if one
person has problem with bandwidth -
everyone in the room suffer?
eventually if there is any setting
that permit us to isolate one with
problems so others are not touched?
thank you again!
daria
On 2/10/2015 09:37, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
Just have tried
Google Chrome 40.0.2214.111 (64-bit)
Mac OS X 10.9.5 (iMac)
conference room works as expected
Maybe there are any specific steps to
reproduce?
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Daria
Mikhaylova <d.mikhayl...@gmail.com
<mailto:d.mikhayl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Seems that last version of google
chrome 40.0.2214.111 installed on
Mac (3 different computers) gives
strange problem for users of OM,
instead of video it shows in
conference an tv-like
interferences and sound is going
on and off.
Firefox works fine. Also previous
versions were going well.
I don't know what can be the
reason, probably flash plugin,
but if you have no time for
frustration of your attendees,
ask them not to use last version
of Chrome.
Thank you!
daria mikhaylova
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
