Thaks Maxim,

I will try to install 1.7.72 and test the recording.

2014-11-05 14:45 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>:

> you are using  JRE is 1_7_11
> latest version available at Oracle is 1.7.71 (or 1.7.72) can you check
> with those
>
> 3.0.4 will be shipped with signed web start application so should work in
> JDK 8 as well
>
> On 5 November 2014 19:41, Antonio Martinez <antonioymer...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Maxim,
>>
>> We can't use version 8 of Java, the corporate software platform of our
>> company, forces us to use the version 7.
>>
>> However, in a PC out our corporate net I could use OM with java version 8
>> but it was inpossible recording any session, due the security configuration
>> of version 8, in Java 7 we have three security levels, very high, high and
>> medium, so, the only level tha let us execute the applet of recording is
>> the medium level. In Java 8 security configuration there are only two
>> levels, very high and high, no one of them allows us run the applet
>> recording. Do you know witch is the correct configuration for Java 8.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-05 14:26 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Can you also check with latest version:
>>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index-jsp-138363.html#JDK7
>>> ?
>>>
>>> On 5 November 2014 19:23, Antonio Martinez <antonioymer...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maxim,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, I'm going to do the cpu check and I will let you know the
>>>> results, the version of the JRE is 1_7_11.
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-11-05 14:17 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> That is really weird results :(
>>>>> What version of JRE is installed on Windows7?
>>>>> Can you check CPU usage on the client recording the screen?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5 November 2014 19:14, Antonio Martinez <antonioymer...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maxim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Following with this issue, we have different behavior depending on
>>>>>> the version of Windows used for recording, I mean, with Windows XP
>>>>>> FPS 2, high quality and screen area, 1.175 width and 816  height, we
>>>>>> have no gap between audio and video (one hour recording). This client 
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> 3,5Gb RAM and a intel core duo 2,39 GHz.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The same recording configuration in a client with Windows7, 8Gb  RAM
>>>>>> and intel core duo 4 GHZ, we have 40 second gap between audio and
>>>>>> video after one hour of recording.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you can see the client with Windows7 has better configuration than
>>>>>> the client with Windows XP, however, the results that we get are worst.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you know if there is any issue with Windows7?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Reply via email to