Thaks Maxim, I will try to install 1.7.72 and test the recording.
2014-11-05 14:45 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>: > you are using JRE is 1_7_11 > latest version available at Oracle is 1.7.71 (or 1.7.72) can you check > with those > > 3.0.4 will be shipped with signed web start application so should work in > JDK 8 as well > > On 5 November 2014 19:41, Antonio Martinez <antonioymer...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Maxim, >> >> We can't use version 8 of Java, the corporate software platform of our >> company, forces us to use the version 7. >> >> However, in a PC out our corporate net I could use OM with java version 8 >> but it was inpossible recording any session, due the security configuration >> of version 8, in Java 7 we have three security levels, very high, high and >> medium, so, the only level tha let us execute the applet of recording is >> the medium level. In Java 8 security configuration there are only two >> levels, very high and high, no one of them allows us run the applet >> recording. Do you know witch is the correct configuration for Java 8. >> >> >> >> 2014-11-05 14:26 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Can you also check with latest version: >>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index-jsp-138363.html#JDK7 >>> ? >>> >>> On 5 November 2014 19:23, Antonio Martinez <antonioymer...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Maxim, >>>> >>>> Thanks, I'm going to do the cpu check and I will let you know the >>>> results, the version of the JRE is 1_7_11. >>>> >>>> Antonio >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-11-05 14:17 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> That is really weird results :( >>>>> What version of JRE is installed on Windows7? >>>>> Can you check CPU usage on the client recording the screen? >>>>> >>>>> On 5 November 2014 19:14, Antonio Martinez <antonioymer...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Following with this issue, we have different behavior depending on >>>>>> the version of Windows used for recording, I mean, with Windows XP >>>>>> FPS 2, high quality and screen area, 1.175 width and 816 height, we >>>>>> have no gap between audio and video (one hour recording). This client >>>>>> have >>>>>> 3,5Gb RAM and a intel core duo 2,39 GHz. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The same recording configuration in a client with Windows7, 8Gb RAM >>>>>> and intel core duo 4 GHZ, we have 40 second gap between audio and >>>>>> video after one hour of recording. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As you can see the client with Windows7 has better configuration than >>>>>> the client with Windows XP, however, the results that we get are worst. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you know if there is any issue with Windows7? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Antonio >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax >