No apparent change in log output: # cat log/red5sip.log 18 Jun 12:20:39 - [main]:[INFO ] o.r.s.a.Application: Red5SIP starting... 18 Jun 12:20:39 - [main]:[INFO ] o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: rtmp:// 127.0.0.1:1935/openmeetings/0 18 Jun 12:20:40 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.s.n.r.RTMPHandshake: Processing server response for encryption 18 Jun 12:20:40 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.s.n.r.RTMPHandshake: Type 0 digest comparison success 18 Jun 12:20:40 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.s.n.r.RTMPHandshake: server response part 2 validation success, is Flash Player v9 handshake 18 Jun 12:20:40 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider 18 Jun 12:20:41 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider 18 Jun 12:20:41 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.s.n.r.RTMPControlClient: connect 18 Jun 12:20:41 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider 18 Jun 12:20:41 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider 18 Jun 12:20:41 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider 18 Jun 12:21:30 - [Main class thread]:[WARN ] o.r.s.a.Main: !!! Shutdown hook !!!
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Artyom Horuzhenko <akhor...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hello John, > > Could you change log output mode to debug for logger "org.red5.sip.app" in > logback.xml and send log again? Are there another errors? > > > 2013/6/18 John Doe <boogieman2...@gmail.com> > >> I am trying to use red5sip to connect OM to an Asterisk server and when I >> run it, I get this: >> >> Starting Red5SIP >> SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings. >> SLF4J: Found binding in >> [jar:file:/usr/adm/red5sip/lib/red5-server.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class] >> SLF4J: Found binding in >> [jar:file:/usr/adm/red5sip/out/lib/logback-classic-jar-1.0.9.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class] >> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an >> explanation. >> SLF4J: Actual binding is of type >> [ch.qos.logback.classic.selector.DefaultContextSelector] >> 18 Jun 11:45:16 - [main]:[INFO ] o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: rtmp:// >> 127.0.0.1:1935/openmeetings/0 >> 18 Jun 11:45:16 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.s.n.r.RTMPHandshake: >> Processing server response for encryption >> 18 Jun 11:45:16 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.s.n.r.RTMPHandshake: Type >> 0 digest comparison success >> 18 Jun 11:45:16 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.s.n.r.RTMPHandshake: >> server response part 2 validation success, is Flash Player v9 handshake >> 18 Jun 11:45:17 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] >> o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to >> handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider >> 18 Jun 11:45:17 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] >> o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to >> handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider >> 18 Jun 11:45:17 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] o.r.s.n.r.RTMPControlClient: >> connect >> 18 Jun 11:45:17 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] >> o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to >> handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider >> 18 Jun 11:45:17 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] >> o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to >> handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider >> 18 Jun 11:45:17 - [NioProcessor-2]:[INFO ] >> o.r.c.n.r.BaseRTMPClientHandler: No service provider / method not found; to >> handle calls like onBWCheck, add a service provider >> >> The error looks like I forgot to configure the sip.obproxy, but I have it >> configured to the correct ip. >> >> When I tried to Google it, the only real results were the actual repo for >> the source code. >> Any thoughts? >> >> >