ok, Peter
No problem. Thx
I'll keep you in touch

On 2020/02/06 09:42:39, Peter Vary <pv...@cloudera.com> wrote: 
> Hi David,
> 
> I more familiar with ACID v2 :(
> What I would do is to run an update operation with your version of Hive and 
> try to see how it handles this case.
> 
> Would be nice to hear back from you if you found something.
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter
> 
> > On Feb 5, 2020, at 16:55, David Morin <morin.david....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > In fact I use HDP 2.6.5 and previous Orc version with transactionid for 
> > example and the update flag.
> > Sorry with the row__id iw would have been easier
> > 
> > So, Here after the Orc files content (with hive --orcfiledump)
> > hive --orcfiledump hdfs://XXXX/delta_0198994_0198994_0000/bucket_00000 
> > {"operation":0,"originalTransaction":198994,"bucket":0,"rowId":14,"currentTransaction":198994,"row":{...}}
> > 
> > hive --orcfiledump hdfs://XXXX/delta_0199073_0199073_0000/bucket_00000 
> > {"operation":1,"originalTransaction":198994,"bucket":0,"rowId":14,"currentTransaction":199073,"row":{...}}
> > 
> > => When I execute a SELECT statement on the PK I see 2 records. The link is 
> > not done.
> > Still, the meta looks good.
> > The only difference I see is that in Orc files I mix operations.
> > When I perform a MERGE statement for example 2 directories have been 
> > created 
> > hdfs://XXXX/delta_0199073_0199073_0000
> > hdfs://XXXX/delta_0199073_0199073_0002
> > And the first one contains updates (operation:1) and the second one, 
> > inserts (operation:0)
> > 
> > And here after the row__id values
> > 
> > (related file: hdfs://XXXX/delta_0198994_0198994_0000/bucket_00000)
> > row__id    {"transactionid":198994,"bucketid":0,"rowid":14}
> > ts         1580751316822642886 (5h35)
> > id         764925
> > 
> > (related file: hdfs://XXXX/delta_0199073_0199073_0000/bucket_00000 )
> > row__id    {"transactionid":198994,"bucketid":0,"rowid":14}
> > ts         1580757191368914630 (7h13)
> > id         764925
> > 
> > => And I have one duplicated value if I execute a Query based on the id 
> > (primary key)
> > 
> > So I don't understand because the transactionid=originalTransaction and all 
> > metadatas seems to be good.
> > Probably a problem in the sort but I follow the rule that data are ordered 
> > by originalTransaction,bucketId,rowId ascendingly and currentTransaction 
> > descendingly. It works pretty well except for some tables with lot of 
> > updates.
> > The only thing I can see at the moment it is the fact that I mix different 
> > types of operations in one bucket. The Merge query for example create 
> > different directories (one per operation)
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > 
> > On 2020/02/05 12:22:28, Peter Vary <pv...@cloudera.com> wrote: 
> >> Hi David,
> >> 
> >> There is no tombstone for the updated record.
> >> In ACID v2 there is no update for the rows. Only insert and delete. So 
> >> update is handled as delete (old) row, insert (new/independent) row.
> >> The delete is stored in the delete delta directories., and the file do not 
> >> have to contain the {row} struct at the end.
> >> 
> >> Hope this helps,
> >> Peter
> >> 
> >>> On Feb 5, 2020, at 09:39, David Morin <morin.david....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> It works pretty well but... still problems sometimes occur
> >>> Do we have to separate operations ?
> >>> 
> >>> Here after Orc files content:
> >>> hive --orcfiledump hdfs://XXXX/delta_0198994_0198994_0000/bucket_00000 
> >>> {"operation":0,"originalTransaction":198994,"bucket":0,"rowId":14,"currentTransaction":198994,"row":{...}}
> >>> 
> >>> hive --orcfiledump hdfs://XXXX/delta_0199073_0199073_0000/bucket_00000 
> >>> {"operation":1,"originalTransaction":198994,"bucket":0,"rowId":14,"currentTransaction":199073,"row":{...}}
> >>> 
> >>> => When I execute a SELECT statement on the PK I see 2 records. The link 
> >>> is not done.
> >>> Still, the meta looks good.
> >>> The only difference I see is that in Orc files I mix operations.
> >>> When I perform a MERGE statement for example 2 directories have been 
> >>> created 
> >>> hdfs://XXXX/delta_0199073_0199073_0000
> >>> hdfs://XXXX/delta_0199073_0199073_0002
> >>> And the first one contains updates (operation:1) and the second one, 
> >>> inserts (operation:0)
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks for your help
> >>> David
> >>> 
> >>> On 2019/12/01 16:57:08, David Morin <morin.david....@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >>>> Hi Peter,
> >>>> 
> >>>> At the moment I have a pipeline based on Flink to write Orc Files. These 
> >>>> Orc Files can be read from Hive thanks to external tables and, then, a 
> >>>> merge statement (triggered by oozie) push these data into tables managed 
> >>>> by Hive (transactional tables => ORC). Hive version is 2.1 because this 
> >>>> is the one provided by HDP 2.6.5.
> >>>> We've developed a system that write Hive Delta Files for the managed 
> >>>> tables directly from Flink.
> >>>> The current streaming apis for Hive 2 are not suitable for our needs and 
> >>>> we cannot use the new Hive 3 streaming api yet. This system uses the 
> >>>> Flink state to store Hive metadata (originalTransaction, bucket, rowId, 
> >>>> ..)
> >>>> Thanks for your reply because yes, when files are ordered by 
> >>>> originalTransacion, bucket, rowId
> >>>> it works ! I just have to use 1 transaction instead of 2 at the moment 
> >>>> and it will be ok.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> David
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 2019/11/29 11:18:05, Peter Vary <pv...@cloudera.com> wrote: 
> >>>>> Hi David,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Not entirely sure what you are doing here :), my guess is that you are 
> >>>>> trying to write ACID tables outside of hive. Am I right? What is the 
> >>>>> exact use-case? There might be better solutions out there than writing 
> >>>>> the files by hand.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> As for your question below: Yes, the files should be ordered by: 
> >>>>> originalTransacion, bucket, rowId triple, otherwise you will get wrong 
> >>>>> results.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Peter
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Nov 19, 2019, at 13:30, David Morin <morin.david....@gmail.com> 
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> here after more details about ORC content and the fact we have 
> >>>>>> duplicate rows:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> /delta_0011365_0011365_0000/bucket_00003
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> {"operation":0,"originalTransaction":11365,"bucket":3,"rowId":0,"currentTransaction":11365,"row":{"TS":1574156027915254212,"cle":5218,...}}
> >>>>>> {"operation":0,"originalTransaction":11365,"bucket":3,"rowId":1,"currentTransaction":11365,"row":{"TS":1574156027915075038,"cle":5216,...}}
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> /delta_0011368_0011368_0000/bucket_00003
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> {"operation":2,"originalTransaction":11365,"bucket":3,"rowId":1,"currentTransaction":11368,"row":null}
> >>>>>> {"operation":2,"originalTransaction":11365,"bucket":3,"rowId":0,"currentTransaction":11368,"row":null}
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> /delta_0011369_0011369_0000/bucket_00003
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> {"operation":0,"originalTransaction":11369,"bucket":3,"rowId":1,"currentTransaction":11369,"row":{"TS":1574157407855174144,"cle":5216,...}}
> >>>>>> {"operation":0,"originalTransaction":11369,"bucket":3,"rowId":0,"currentTransaction":11369,"row":{"TS":1574157407855265906,"cle":5218,...}}
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> +-------------------------------------------------+-------+--+
> >>>>>> |                     row__id                     |  cle  |
> >>>>>> +-------------------------------------------------+-------+--+
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11367,"bucketid":0,"rowid":0}  | 5209  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11369,"bucketid":0,"rowid":0}  | 5211  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11369,"bucketid":1,"rowid":0}  | 5210  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11369,"bucketid":2,"rowid":0}  | 5214  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11369,"bucketid":2,"rowid":1}  | 5215  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11365,"bucketid":3,"rowid":0}  | 5218  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11365,"bucketid":3,"rowid":1}  | 5216  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11369,"bucketid":3,"rowid":1}  | 5216  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11369,"bucketid":3,"rowid":0}  | 5218  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11369,"bucketid":4,"rowid":0}  | 5217  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11369,"bucketid":4,"rowid":1}  | 5213  |
> >>>>>> | {"transactionid":11369,"bucketid":7,"rowid":0}  | 5212  |
> >>>>>> +-------------------------------------------------+-------+--+
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> As you can see we have duplicate rows for column "cle" 5216 and 5218
> >>>>>> Do we have to keep the rowids ordered ? because this is the only 
> >>>>>> difference I have noticed based on some tests with beeline.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Le mar. 19 nov. 2019 à 00:18, David Morin <morin.david....@gmail.com 
> >>>>>> <mailto:morin.david....@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> >>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> I'm trying to understand the purpose of the rowid column inside ORC 
> >>>>>> delta file
> >>>>>> {"transactionid":11359,"bucketid":5,"rowid":0}
> >>>>>> Orc view: 
> >>>>>> {"operation":0,"originalTransaction":11359,"bucket":5,"rowId":0,"currentTransaction":11359,"row":...}
> >>>>>> I use HDP 2.6 => Hive 2
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> If I want to be idempotent with INSERT / DELETE / INSERT. 
> >>>>>> Do we have to keep the same rowid ?
> >>>>>> It seems that when the rowid is changed during the second INSERT I 
> >>>>>> have a duplicate row.
> >>>>>> For me, I can create a new rowid for the new transaction during the 
> >>>>>> second INSERT but that seems to generate duplicate records.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> David
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to