On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote:
I have added the mailing lists to the document on Carl and Ed's
suggestion. I am not sure if we should make public on who is in the
committer pipeline.
Joy's point is valid - should we explicitly call out lazy approval
as one +1. It is expected that nothing would get committed unless a
committer +1s a change and commits it.
Alan, how is pig addressing this?
Pig requires a +1 from a committer (or an additional committer if a
committer contributed the code) in the code change case. I didn't do
the best job of capturing that in the table, but that has been and
continues to be the practice in the our community.
On the votes for committer, I am fairly certain that PMC members are
barred from disclosing that people are being voted on. I would
recommend checking with the Apache board before you open up this
information.
Alan.
Ashish
________________________________________
From: Edward Capriolo [edlinuxg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:16 PM
To: user@hive.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project
+1
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Zheng Shao <zsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Thusoo <athu...@facebook.com>
wrote:
I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :)
Ashish
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <jsi...@facebook.com>
wrote:
Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :)
JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste)
On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote:
Hi Folks,
I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive
Project
https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html
These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws
that were recently proposed by Alan Gates.
We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these
bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All
Pig
users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though
only PMC votes will be binding.
+1 from me..
Ashish
