I have added the mailing lists to the document on Carl and Ed's suggestion. I am not sure if we should make public on who is in the committer pipeline.
Joy's point is valid - should we explicitly call out lazy approval as one +1. It is expected that nothing would get committed unless a committer +1s a change and commits it. Alan, how is pig addressing this? Ashish ________________________________________ From: Edward Capriolo [edlinuxg...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:16 PM To: user@hive.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project +1 On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Zheng Shao <zsh...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Thusoo <athu...@facebook.com> wrote: > >> I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :) >> >> Ashish >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <jsi...@facebook.com> wrote: >> >>> Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) >>> >>> JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Folks, >>>> >>>> I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive >>>> Project >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html >>>> >>>> These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws >>>> that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. >>>> >>>> We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these >>>> bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig >>>> users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though >>>> only PMC votes will be binding. >>>> >>>> +1 from me.. >>>> >>>> Ashish >>> >
