Good to know that there is already a JIRA for this.Thanks. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:
> The need to update the javadocs published on the site is a long standing > issue. Please keep discussion for it on its jira: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13140 > > (there's also a workaround provided) > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:23 PM, anil gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > http://hbase.apache.org/apidocs/index.html > > > > Above link refers to HBase2.0 docs and another link on our website refers > > to 0.94. So, there is no way to reach to 0.98,1.0 or 1.1 > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:18 AM, anil gupta <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Since we are talking about HBase documentation. Is it possible to have > > > docs for Specific versions. Right now, JavaDocs refer to 0.94 or > > HBase2.0. > > > Its not convenient to look at 2.0 docs while working on 0.98 or 1.0. I > > > hope this should not be super difficult to accomplish. > > > Apache Kafka, ElasticSearch, and many other product make the docs > > > available for all the currently supported versions. > > > > > > It would be nice if we can just change the version in this url: > > > http://hbase.apache.org/<hbase_version>/apidocs/index.html and look > at > > > the docs. That's how many Apache TLP's do. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 too. Even if cleaner and nicer, searching in it is a pain > compares > > to > > >> before. > > >> Le 2015-07-30 07:17, "Shane O'Donnell" <[email protected]> a > écrit > > : > > >> > > >> > +1. > > >> > > > >> > One specific case where this is an issue is if you are entering the > > book > > >> > with an anchor link. If you try this, it appears to just hang. > > >> > > > >> > Shane O. > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Lars Francke < > > [email protected] > > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > While I like the new and better layout of the book it is painful > > to > > >> > use - > > >> > > > at least for me - because of its size. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I've started to notice this too. It'd be sweet if it loaded more > > >> > promptly. > > >> > > Thanks for starting the discussion. > > >> > > St.Ack > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Anil Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Anil Gupta > > > > > > -- > Sean > -- Thanks & Regards, Anil Gupta
