The need to update the javadocs published on the site is a long standing
issue. Please keep discussion for it on its jira:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13140

(there's also a workaround provided)

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:23 PM, anil gupta <[email protected]> wrote:

> http://hbase.apache.org/apidocs/index.html
>
> Above link refers to HBase2.0 docs and another link on our website refers
> to 0.94. So, there is no way to reach to 0.98,1.0 or 1.1
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:18 AM, anil gupta <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Since we are talking about HBase documentation. Is it possible to have
> > docs for Specific versions. Right now, JavaDocs refer to  0.94 or
> HBase2.0.
> > Its not convenient to look at 2.0 docs while working on 0.98 or 1.0. I
> > hope this should not be super difficult to accomplish.
> > Apache Kafka, ElasticSearch, and many other product make the docs
> > available for all the currently supported versions.
> >
> > It would be nice if we can just change the version in this url:
> > http://hbase.apache.org/<hbase_version>/apidocs/index.html  and look at
> > the docs. That's how many Apache TLP's do.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 too.  Even if cleaner and nicer,  searching in it is a pain compares
> to
> >> before.
> >> Le 2015-07-30 07:17, "Shane O'Donnell" <[email protected]> a écrit
> :
> >>
> >> > +1.
> >> >
> >> > One specific case where this is an issue is if you are entering the
> book
> >> > with an anchor link.  If you try this, it appears to just hang.
> >> >
> >> > Shane O.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Lars Francke <
> [email protected]
> >> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > While I like the new and better layout of the book it is painful
> to
> >> > use -
> >> > > > at least for me - because of its size.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > I've started to notice this too. It'd be sweet if it loaded more
> >> > promptly.
> >> > > Thanks for starting the discussion.
> >> > > St.Ack
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Anil Gupta
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Anil Gupta
>



-- 
Sean

Reply via email to