On May 21, 2026 11:44:51 PM PDT, Joachim Lindenberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>That's a good thought, too. I'll have to dig in a little and see how feasible >>that is - I'm not sure if historical records have any notion of an "owner" at >>the moment, so it would probably have to be done by comparing the username of >>the ConnectionRecord with the current user. >> >>-Nick > >I have to warn about using names instead of ids. Names can change or collide, >whereas ids should not. > Internal, unique IDs are indeed already used in the database for all objects.
- Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
