>That's a good thought, too. I'll have to dig in a little and see how feasible >that is - I'm not sure if historical records have any notion of an "owner" at >the moment, so it would probably have to be done by comparing the username of >the ConnectionRecord with the current user. > >-Nick
I have to warn about using names instead of ids. Names can change or collide, whereas ids should not. Thanks for your consideration! Regards, Joachim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
