Sorry, I read something wrong when I read FLIP.

It's fine for me.

Best,
Rui

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:32 PM Junrui Lee <jrlee....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rui,
>
> Thank you for your feedback. Regarding your question, I want to let you
> know that we have included the alternative getter method "@PublicEvolving
> Map<String, String> getGlobalJobParameters()" in this FLIP. And this method
> will provide users with global job parameters.
> I would appreciate it if you could share your thoughts on whether this
> addition adequately resolves your concerns.
>
> Best,
> Junrui
>
> Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月16日周四 13:15写道:
>
>> Thanks Junrui for driving this proposal!
>>
>> Overall looks good to me! I have a question:
>> How do the flink users to getGlobalJobParameters if
>> RuntimeContext#getExecutionConfig is removed?
>> Is there any alternative api? Or is this feature removed?
>>
>> Maybe this is a noob question and I may have missed
>> some information.
>>
>> Best,
>> Rui
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:05 AM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Junrui for creating the FLIP and kicking off this discussion.
>>>
>>> Exposing a mutable ExecutionConfig which is even shared by multiple
>>> operators is truly a defect which can result in weird results.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Zhu
>>>
>>> Junrui Lee <jrlee....@gmail.com> 于2023年11月15日周三 16:53写道:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to start a discussion of FLIP-391: Deprecate
>>>> RuntimeContext#getExecutionConfig[1].
>>>>
>>>> Currently, the FLINK RuntimeContext is important for connecting user
>>>> functions to the underlying runtime details. It provides users with
>>>> necessary runtime information during job execution.
>>>> However, he current implementation of the FLINK RuntimeContext exposes
>>>> the
>>>> ExecutionConfig to users, resulting in two issues:
>>>> Firstly, the ExecutionConfig contains much unrelated information that
>>>> can
>>>> confuse users and complicate management.
>>>> Secondly, exposing the ExecutionConfig allows users to modify it during
>>>> job
>>>> execution, which can cause inconsistencies and problems, especially with
>>>> operator chaining.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, we propose deprecating the RuntimeContext#getExecutionConfig
>>>> in
>>>> the FLINK RuntimeContext. In the upcoming FLINK-2.0 version, we plan to
>>>> completely remove the RuntimeContext#getExecutionConfig method.
>>>> Instead, we
>>>> will introduce alternative getter methods that enable users to access
>>>> specific information without exposing unnecessary runtime details. These
>>>> getter methods will include:
>>>>
>>>> 1. @PublicEvolving <T> TypeSerializer<T>
>>>> createSerializer(TypeInformation<T> typeInformation);
>>>> 2. @PublicEvolving Map<String, String> getGlobalJobParameters();
>>>> 3. @PublicEvolving boolean isObjectReuseEnabled();
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to your feedback and suggestions, thanks.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=278465937
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Junrui
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to