Sorry, I read something wrong when I read FLIP. It's fine for me.
Best, Rui On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:32 PM Junrui Lee <jrlee....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rui, > > Thank you for your feedback. Regarding your question, I want to let you > know that we have included the alternative getter method "@PublicEvolving > Map<String, String> getGlobalJobParameters()" in this FLIP. And this method > will provide users with global job parameters. > I would appreciate it if you could share your thoughts on whether this > addition adequately resolves your concerns. > > Best, > Junrui > > Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月16日周四 13:15写道: > >> Thanks Junrui for driving this proposal! >> >> Overall looks good to me! I have a question: >> How do the flink users to getGlobalJobParameters if >> RuntimeContext#getExecutionConfig is removed? >> Is there any alternative api? Or is this feature removed? >> >> Maybe this is a noob question and I may have missed >> some information. >> >> Best, >> Rui >> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:05 AM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Junrui for creating the FLIP and kicking off this discussion. >>> >>> Exposing a mutable ExecutionConfig which is even shared by multiple >>> operators is truly a defect which can result in weird results. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Zhu >>> >>> Junrui Lee <jrlee....@gmail.com> 于2023年11月15日周三 16:53写道: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'd like to start a discussion of FLIP-391: Deprecate >>>> RuntimeContext#getExecutionConfig[1]. >>>> >>>> Currently, the FLINK RuntimeContext is important for connecting user >>>> functions to the underlying runtime details. It provides users with >>>> necessary runtime information during job execution. >>>> However, he current implementation of the FLINK RuntimeContext exposes >>>> the >>>> ExecutionConfig to users, resulting in two issues: >>>> Firstly, the ExecutionConfig contains much unrelated information that >>>> can >>>> confuse users and complicate management. >>>> Secondly, exposing the ExecutionConfig allows users to modify it during >>>> job >>>> execution, which can cause inconsistencies and problems, especially with >>>> operator chaining. >>>> >>>> Therefore, we propose deprecating the RuntimeContext#getExecutionConfig >>>> in >>>> the FLINK RuntimeContext. In the upcoming FLINK-2.0 version, we plan to >>>> completely remove the RuntimeContext#getExecutionConfig method. >>>> Instead, we >>>> will introduce alternative getter methods that enable users to access >>>> specific information without exposing unnecessary runtime details. These >>>> getter methods will include: >>>> >>>> 1. @PublicEvolving <T> TypeSerializer<T> >>>> createSerializer(TypeInformation<T> typeInformation); >>>> 2. @PublicEvolving Map<String, String> getGlobalJobParameters(); >>>> 3. @PublicEvolving boolean isObjectReuseEnabled(); >>>> >>>> Looking forward to your feedback and suggestions, thanks. >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=278465937 >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Junrui >>>> >>>