An update: The extra memory that is being acquired/kept after each pipeline
run seems to be coming from off-heap space, especially using
`Unsafe.allocateMemory`. I have added some notes here
<https://github.com/google/fhir-data-pipes/issues/777#issuecomment-1703142297>
but
the TL;DR; is that adding a GC hint at the end of each pipeline run
mitigates the issue significantly. The idea of adding the GC hint came from
FLINK-15758 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15758> so I am not
sure if that is still a problem. Our code is open-source and the bandaid
fix we have added is this PR
<https://github.com/google/fhir-data-pipes/pull/802> (the `System.gc()` is
the main relevant part).

Any insights from someone who knows the internals of Flink is appreciated.

-B

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 3:47 AM Chandrashekar Sankarapu <
sankar...@google.com> wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> We have a data pipeline which is built using Apache Beam SDK
> <https://beam.apache.org/> and we use Apache Flink Runner
> <https://beam.apache.org/documentation/runners/flink/> to execute Beam
> pipelines. We use the local embedded execution mode of Flink for running
> the pipelines.
>
> Currently, we are running into an issue where in the batch pipeline can be
> triggered multiple times and each time the pipeline is triggered the Flink
> creates a miniCluster in local execution mode, runs the job and destroys
> the miniCluster once the job is completed. When the batch job is triggered
> multiple times we observe the application process Resident Set Size(RSS)
> memory keeps increasing (approximately increases by a value set for
> parameter 'taskmanager.memory.network.max') with each run and is not
> released, eventually leading to crash of the docker container (container
> memory is limited) in which this is deployed. However, when we checked the
> JVM memory using tools like JConsole, jcmd etc does not show any increase
> and is always with the Xmx value set.
>
> We analysed the heap dump of the application but it didn't show any memory
> leaks.
>
> Has anyone faced this issue? Any pointers are appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Chandra
>

Reply via email to