It depends on your requirements. Personally, I don't use PVs and, instead, mount a volume from a host with a fast instance-level SSD.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 11:26 AM Tony Chen <tony.ch...@robinhood.com> wrote: > We used to have a Persistent Volume (PV), attached to the pod, for storing > the RocksDB data while using the GoogleCloudPlatform operator. For the > Apache flink-kubernetes-operator, do the pods need a PV attached to it to > use RocksDB? If not, do you have recommendations on memory configuration > for these pods? > > I will also need to go through the documentation more on memory > configuration: > https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-release-1.14/docs/ops/state/state_backends/ > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:17 PM Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Rocksdb is supported and every other state backend as well. >> >> You can simply set this in you config like before :) >> >> Cheers >> Gyula >> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 19:22, Tony Chen <tony.ch...@robinhood.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Flink Community, >>> >>> Does the flink-kubernetes-operator support RocksDB as the state backend >>> for FlinkDeployment? >>> >>> We have some Flink applications that have large states, and we were able >>> to deal with these large states in the past with RocksDB. If there is no >>> support for RocksDB, are there any recommendations on how we can decrease >>> the size of these states? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tony >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> <http://www.robinhood.com/> >>> >>> Tony Chen >>> >>> Software Engineer >>> >>> Menlo Park, CA >>> >>> Don't copy, share, or use this email without permission. If you received >>> it by accident, please let us know and then delete it right away. >>> >> > > -- > > <http://www.robinhood.com/> > > Tony Chen > > Software Engineer > > Menlo Park, CA > > Don't copy, share, or use this email without permission. If you received > it by accident, please let us know and then delete it right away. >
