Hi,

On 11/1/2019 4:40 PM, Piotr Nowojski wrote:
Hi,

More important would be the code profiling output. I think VisualVM allows to share the code profiling result as “snapshots”? If you could analyse or share this, it would be helpful.
Enclosed is a snapshot of VisualVM.

From the attached screenshot the only thing that is visible is that there are no GC issues, and secondly the application is running only on one (out of 10?) CPU cores. Which hints one obvious way how to improve the performance - scale out. However the WordCount example might not be the best for this, as I’m pretty sure its source is fundamentally not parallel.

Yes, your are right that the source is not parallel. Checking the timeline of execution shows that the source operation is done in less than a second while Map and Reduce operations take long running time.

Habib


Piotrek

On 1 Nov 2019, at 15:57, Habib Mostafaei <ha...@inet.tu-berlin.de <mailto:ha...@inet.tu-berlin.de>> wrote:

Hi Piotrek,

Thanks for the list of profilers. I used VisualVM and here is the resource usage for taskManager.

<imiafpejagonadce.png>

Habib


On 11/1/2019 9:48 AM, Piotr Nowojski wrote:
Hi,

>  Is there a simple way to get profiling information in Flink?

Flink doesn’t provide any special tooling for that. Just use your chosen profiler, for example: Oracle’s Mission Control (free on non production clusters, no need to install anything if already using Oracle’s JVM), VisualVM (I think free), YourKit (paid). For each one of them there is a plenty of online support how to use them both for local and remote profiling.

Piotrek

On 31 Oct 2019, at 14:05, Habib Mostafaei <ha...@inet.tu-berlin.de <mailto:ha...@inet.tu-berlin.de>> wrote:

I enclosed all logs from the run and for this run I used parallelism one. However, for other runs I checked and found that all parallel workers were working properly. Is there a simple way to get profiling information in Flink?

Best,

Habib

On 10/31/2019 2:54 AM, Zhenghua Gao wrote:
I think more runtime information would help figure outwheretheproblem is.
1) how many parallelisms actually working
2) the metrics for each operator
3) the jvm profiling information, etc

*Best Regards,*
*Zhenghua Gao*


On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:25 PM Habib Mostafaei <ha...@inet.tu-berlin.de <mailto:ha...@inet.tu-berlin.de>> wrote:

    Thanks Gao for the reply. I used the parallelism parameter
    with different values like 6 and 8 but still the execution
    time is not comparable with a single threaded python script.
    What would be the reasonable value for the parallelism?

    Best,

    Habib

    On 10/30/2019 1:17 PM, Zhenghua Gao wrote:
    The reason might be the parallelism of your task is only 1,
    that's too low.
    See [1] to specify proper parallelism for your job, and the
    execution time should be reduced significantly.

    [1]
    https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/dev/parallel.html

    *Best Regards,*
    *Zhenghua Gao*


    On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:27 PM Habib Mostafaei
    <ha...@inet.tu-berlin.de <mailto:ha...@inet.tu-berlin.de>> wrote:

        Hi all,

        I am running Flink on a standalone cluster and getting
        very long
        execution time for the streaming queries like WordCount
        for a fixed text
        file. My VM runs on a Debian 10 with 16 cpu cores and
        32GB of RAM. I
        have a text file with size of 2GB. When I run the Flink
        on a standalone
        cluster, i.e., one JobManager and one taskManager with
        25GB of heapsize,
        it took around two hours to finish counting this file
        while a simple
        python script can do it in around 7 minutes. Just
        wondering what is
        wrong with my setup. I ran the experiments on a cluster
        with six
        taskManagers, but I still get very long execution time
        like 25 minutes
        or so. I tried to increase the JVM heap size to have
        lower execution
        time but it did not help. I attached the log file and the
        Flink
        configuration file to this email.

        Best,

        Habib


<flink-xxx-client-xxx.log><flink-xxx-standalonesession-0-xxx.log><flink-xxx-taskexecutor-0-xxx.log>


Attachment: application-1572869697842.apps
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to