Hi Timo,
Thanks for your answer
I was looking for a Tuple as to feed a BatchTableSink<T> subclass, but it
may be achived with a Row instead?
All the best
François
2018-08-24 10:21 GMT+02:00 Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> tuples are just a sub category of rows. Because the tuple arity is limited
> to 25 fields. I think the easiest solution would be to write your own
> converter that maps rows to tuples if you know that you will not need more
> than 25 fields. Otherwise it might be easier to just use a TextInputFormat
> and do the parsing yourself with a library.
>
> Regards,
> Timo
>
>
> Am 23.08.18 um 18:54 schrieb françois lacombe:
>
> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm looking for best practices regarding Tuple<T> instances creation.
>>
>> I have a TypeInformation object produced by AvroSchemaConverter.convertToT
>> ypeInfo("{...}");
>> Is this possible to define a corresponding Tuple<T> instance with it?
>> (get the T from the TypeInformation)
>>
>> Example :
>> {
>> "type": "record",
>> "fields": [
>> { "name": "field1", "type": "int" },
>> { "name": "field2", "type": "string"}
>> ]}
>> = Tuple2<Int,String>
>>
>> The same question rises with DataSet or other any record handling class
>> with parametrized types.
>>
>> My goal is to parse several CsvFiles with different structures described
>> in an Avro schema.
>> It would be great to not hard-code structures in my Java code and only
>> get types information at runtime from Avro schemas
>>
>> Is this possible?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> François Lacombe
>>
>
>
>
