Thanks for the answer! But I need some clarification: "So it is up to debate how the support for resuming from intermediate results will look like." -> What's the current state of that debate? "Intermediate results are not produced within the iterations cycles." -> Ok, if there are none, what does it have to do with that debate? :-)
Cheers, Max On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Max, > > You are right, there is no support for nested iterations yet. As far as I > know, there are no concrete plans to add support for it. So it is up to > debate how the support for resuming from intermediate results will look > like. Intermediate results are not produced within the iterations cycles. > Same would be true for nested iterations. So the behavior for resuming from > intermediate results should be alike for nested iterations. > > Cheers, > Max > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Maximilian Alber < > alber.maximil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Flinksters, >> >> as far as I know, there is still no support for nested iterations >> planned. Am I right? >> >> So my question is how such use cases should be handled in the future. >> More specific: when pinning/caching will be available, you suggest to use >> that feature and program in "Spark" style? Or is there some other, more >> flexible, mechanism planned for loops? >> >> Cheers, >> Max >> > >
