Ahh, my bad again - I missed the whole point of using ObjectSelect
somehow, probably because it's difficult to explain without having your
model. Anyways here's a shot at it, conceptually the same as what you did
in the modeller:
List<Object[]> results = ObjectSelect.query( ObjEntityA.class )
.columns( ObjEntityA.PROP_FOR_OBJ_E.dot( ObjEntityE.PROP_A ),
ObjEntityA.PROP_FOR_OBJ_E.dot( ObjEntityE.PROP_B ),
ObjEntityA.PROP_FOR_OBJ_E.dot( ObjEntityE.PROP_C ) )
.where( ObjEntityA.PROP_FOR_OBJ_B.dot( ObjEntityB.PROP_FOR_OBJ_C ).dot(
ObjEntityC.PROP_FOR_OBJ_D )
.dot( ObjEntityD.PROP_B ) // this is t3.varB
.eq( "somevalue" ) )
.select( context );
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 22:45:24 +0200, Christian Gonzalez
<christian.gonza...@smartscrubs.com> wrote:
Looks like it worked, thank you. It is definitely an interesting way of
doing it although I'm not sure about how I feel about having to make a
new
entity every time a query like this is used but hopefully it won't be too
often.
Thank you for your help.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:08 AM Jurgen Doll <jur...@ivoryemr.co.za>
wrote:
Ahh, sorry my bad I didn't see the t0 for tableE.
There may be other ways to do it but I think adding t3.varB as an
attribute to the object entity might be the simplest.
Regards
Jurgen