Thanks to you all for the feedback! Hearing 4.2 is seeing pretty widespread 
production use was exactly what I needed, moving there :).

- hugi


> On 22 Nov 2022, at 06:45, Andrus Adamchik <aadamc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Exactly. There's lots of good stuff planned for 5.0, but it is not developed 
> yet. So 4.2 is the best choice right now. It is both modern and stable. I 
> also use it in prod everywhere. 
> 
> 4.2 is about to go GA once we figure out how fix some Modeler issues caused 
> by the latest MacOS.
> 
> Andrus
> 
> 
>> On Nov 21, 2022, at 11:56 PM, John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The main feature of 5.0 at this point is the removal of deprecated features
>> (like the ROP platform), so either one is a good choice I'd say. But I'd go
>> with 4.2.
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 3:44 PM Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi guys!
>>> I'm about to be rid of a legacy DB that's been keeping my most important
>>> application stuck on a heavily modified Cayenne 4.1 stack. So, finally
>>> looking into joining modernity and upgrading Cayenne (yay!).
>>> 
>>> I see there's a lot of stuff happening in 5.0 at the moment and I'd like
>>> to take my "non business-critical" stuff there so I can partake in the fun.
>>> 
>>> But then there's the more serious (read: paying customer) software. Seeing
>>> as how v4.2 is still in the RC stage, with 5.0 receiving active
>>> development, would you recommend migrating "real apps" to 4.2 now—or just
>>> not bothering, holding out and moving directly to 5.0? Is anyone using the
>>> 4.2 RC in production yet?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> - hugi

Reply via email to