We need to decide. "select" is first on the list. Update and delete will require separate query objects.
Andrus > On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:21 PM, Bob Schellink <sab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Interesting. Would that still support update/delete? Or selects only? > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:23 PM Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > wrote: > >> You are totally right. EJBQL name is obsolete and was borrowed at one time >> from the JPA spec before it got renamed there. >> >> There is a more ambitious plan for it though - simply make it a parseable >> String representation of ObjectSelect query. It requires ObjectSelect to >> catch up on some of the functionality only available in EJBQLQuery now, but >> it is getting pretty close. >> >> Andrus >> >> >>> On Aug 15, 2018, at 8:07 PM, Bob Schellink <sab...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Would it make sense to rename EJBQLQuery to JPAQLQuery? Not sure is there >>> is a difference between the two languages, but the name JPAQL is more >>> commonly used. >>> >>> Kind regards >>> >>> Bob >> >>
