Interesting. Would that still support update/delete? Or selects only? On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:23 PM Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> You are totally right. EJBQL name is obsolete and was borrowed at one time > from the JPA spec before it got renamed there. > > There is a more ambitious plan for it though - simply make it a parseable > String representation of ObjectSelect query. It requires ObjectSelect to > catch up on some of the functionality only available in EJBQLQuery now, but > it is getting pretty close. > > Andrus > > > > On Aug 15, 2018, at 8:07 PM, Bob Schellink <sab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Would it make sense to rename EJBQLQuery to JPAQLQuery? Not sure is there > > is a difference between the two languages, but the name JPAQL is more > > commonly used. > > > > Kind regards > > > > Bob > >
