Ah, excellent! Where inside ERCayenne are they though, can’t find them at a quick glance.
- hugi // Hugi Thordarson // http://www.loftfar.is/ <http://www.loftfar.is/> // s. 895-6688 > On 1. apr. 2015, at 14:03, John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are WO friendly templates for Cayenne in the ERCayenne framework in > Project Wonder that you can copy. > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:18 AM Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: > >> This works with 3.0.2. I need to upgrade it for 3.1, but hopefully it'll >> give you the general idea: >> >> https://github.com/mrg/cbe/tree/master/Templates >> >> http://mrg.github.io/cbe/custom-templates.html >> >> mrg >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> wrote: >> >>> Hi Michael. >>> Thanks for the pointer, I’d love an example of rolling my own templates. >>> Are the standard default templates accessible somewhere? >>> >>> Also, is class file generation accessible via an API or otherwise >>> supported outside of the Modeler? One convenient feature of WOLips (when >>> using EOF) is autogeneration of classes every time the model changes. If >>> this doesn’t currently exist in Cayenne I’d like to implement it. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> - hugi >>> >>> // Hugi Thordarson >>> // http://www.loftfar.is/ <http://www.loftfar.is/> >>> // s. 895-6688 >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 1. apr. 2015, at 12:47, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Hugi, >>>> >>>> You can roll your own templates (I've done this in the past) and change >>> the >>>> names if you like, but keep in mind it may complicate your life if you >>> use >>>> other projects (such as Tapestry) which rely upon the Java Beans >>> convention >>>> (get*, set*, is*) when doing reflection to call the Cayenne methods. >>>> >>>> If you want to roll your own templates, I can point you to an example. >>>> >>>> mrg >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all. >>>>> Can I generate my DataObject classes without a “get”-prefix for >>> attribute >>>>> accessor names? I much prefer the style of “name()” over “getName()”. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> - hugi >>>>> >>>>> PS: Sorry for my flooding of the list. Catching up on previous work on >>>>> migration from EOF— I must say 4.0.M2 looks just awesome. >>> >>> >>
