Hi Hugi, You can roll your own templates (I've done this in the past) and change the names if you like, but keep in mind it may complicate your life if you use other projects (such as Tapestry) which rely upon the Java Beans convention (get*, set*, is*) when doing reflection to call the Cayenne methods.
If you want to roll your own templates, I can point you to an example. mrg On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> wrote: > Hi all. > Can I generate my DataObject classes without a “get”-prefix for attribute > accessor names? I much prefer the style of “name()” over “getName()”. > > Cheers, > - hugi > > PS: Sorry for my flooding of the list. Catching up on previous work on > migration from EOF— I must say 4.0.M2 looks just awesome.
