There is not much I can tell you about WO than pointing you to the following link http://www.wocommunity.org
Regards. ________________________________ From: Juan José Gil <mat...@gmail.com> To: user@cayenne.apache.org; emeka okafor <emeka_1...@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 3:48 AM Subject: Re: Add ActiveRecord support to Cayenne Pardon my ignorance, I really don't understand what do you mean with >>Beside that I rather do simple stuffs like the webobjects guys do. You do not hear them complain about such >>things like services, and dependency injection and what not I don't know anything about WO :( I would really appreciate to have some clue about that :) Regards, Juanjo 2012/12/26 emeka okafor <emeka_1...@yahoo.com> > It depends on what you call service. Is a service a message call that is > remote in the sense that it is outside of the same JVM or is a service any > random function that do not belong to the domain object? If I am working in > a j2ee/spring environment i.e I want to use ejbs or have a container > managed my objects, then you are right and I am going to have a problem > integrating cayenne objects into that environment and will do all kind of > gymnastic to accomodate for that, by creating fake pojos with wrapper and > annotations so that the container can inject those services. In this case, > my cayenne objects become naked(cayenne is not to blame for that). > Personally I would rather program in groovy with metaprogramming than do > all that stuff if I had to. Beside that I rather do simple stuffs like the > webobjects guys do. You do not hear them complain about such things like > services, and dependency injection and what not. I mean, last time I > checked, Apple Itunes > was running on a technologie similar to cayenne. >
