It has been discussed in past in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4175.
I believe it is fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8099, though we have not evaluated the performance. Will be glad if someone can reply with benchmarks. On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Atul Saroha <atul.sar...@snapdeal.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > Some time back, I had seen a Jira which tells me that the limitation to > use small column names for performance benefit is no longer valid. Now > cassandra generate some unique identifier for each column name in the > table. So larger table name and column names are no longer an issue for > performance and data storage. > > Is this true for cassandra 3.0.3? > Does anyone knows that Jira number as i missed it? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Atul Saroha > *Sr. Software Engineer* > *M*: +91 8447784271 *T*: +91 124-415-6069 *EXT*: 12369 > Plot # 362, ASF Centre - Tower A, Udyog Vihar, > Phase -4, Sector 18, Gurgaon, Haryana 122016, INDIA >
