> Wide rows? How wide? How many rows per partition, typically and at the 
> extreme? how many clustering columns?


Yes, wide rows with deletions of old data. 
Number of keys (estimate): 909428
How I can calculate rows per partition via nodetool/jmx?
~ From 100 to 5,000,000.

I know its anti-pattern - cyclic buffer / queue.
But problems begins when we start adding new nodes to cluster - old & new nodes 
do compactions.

DroppableTombstoneRatio: 5 - 6.5
TombstonesPerSlice: 0

CREATE TABLE home_timeline (
    uid blob,
    tuuid timeuuid,
    cid text,
    cuid blob,
    PRIMARY KEY (uid, tuuid)
) WITH CLUSTERING ORDER BY (tuuid ASC)
    AND bloom_filter_fp_chance = 0.1
    AND caching = '{"keys":"ALL", "rows_per_partition":"NONE"}'
    AND compaction = {'sstable_size_in_mb': '160', 'class': 
'org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.LeveledCompactionStrategy'}
    AND compression = {'sstable_compression': 
'org.apache.cassandra.io.compress.LZ4Compressor'}
    AND dclocal_read_repair_chance = 0.0
    AND default_time_to_live = 0
    AND gc_grace_seconds = 86400
    AND max_index_interval = 2048
    AND memtable_flush_period_in_ms = 0
    AND min_index_interval = 128
    AND read_repair_chance = 0.1
    AND speculative_retry = '99.0PERCENTILE';

But we query this table with ORDER BY tuuid DESC. Could this be a problem?

> When you restart the node does it revert to completely normal response?
Yes it does.

> Which release of Cassandra?
Cassandra 2.1.13

> Does every node eventually hit this problem?
Yes, almost all.

> After a restart, how long before the problem recurs for that node?
Sometimes it occurred after 5 minutes after restart, sometimes it was 4 hours.


> On 12 Feb 2016, at 23:20, Jack Krupansky <jack.krupan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Wide rows? How wide? How many rows per partition, typically and at the 
> extreme? how many clustering columns?
> 
> When you restart the node does it revert to completely normal response?
> 
> Which release of Cassandra?
> 
> Does every node eventually hit this problem?
> 
> After a restart, how long before the problem recurs for that node?
> 
> -- Jack Krupansky
> 
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Skvazh Roman <r...@skvazh.com 
> <mailto:r...@skvazh.com>> wrote:
> Hello!
> We have a cluster of 25 c3.4xlarge nodes (16 cores, 32 GiB) with attached 1.5 
> TB 4000 PIOPS EBS drive.
> Sometimes one or two nodes user cpu spikes to 100%, load average to 20-30 - 
> read requests drops of.
> Only restart of this cassandra services helps.
> Please advice.
> 
> One big table with wide rows. 600 Gb per node.
> LZ4Compressor
> LeveledCompaction
> 
> concurrent compactors: 4
> compactor throughput: tried from 16 to 128
> Concurrent_readers: from 16 to 32
> Concurrent_writers: 128
> 
> 
> https://gist.github.com/rskvazh/de916327779b98a437a6 
> <https://gist.github.com/rskvazh/de916327779b98a437a6>
> 
> 
>  JvmTop 0.8.0 alpha - 06:51:10,  amd64, 16 cpus, Linux 3.14.44-3, load avg 
> 19.35
>  http://code.google.com/p/jvmtop <http://code.google.com/p/jvmtop>
> 
>  Profiling PID 9256: org.apache.cassandra.service.CassandraDa
> 
>   95.73% (     4.31s) 
> ....google.common.collect.AbstractIterator.tryToComputeN()
>    1.39% (     0.06s) com.google.common.base.Objects.hashCode()
>    1.26% (     0.06s) io.netty.channel.epoll.Native.epollWait()
>    0.85% (     0.04s) net.jpountz.lz4.LZ4JNI.LZ4_compress_limitedOutput()
>    0.46% (     0.02s) net.jpountz.lz4.LZ4JNI.LZ4_decompress_fast()
>    0.26% (     0.01s) com.google.common.collect.Iterators$7.computeNext()
>    0.06% (     0.00s) io.netty.channel.epoll.Native.eventFdWrite()
> 
> 
> ttop:
> 
> 2016-02-12T08:20:25.605+0000 Process summary
>   process cpu=1565.15%
>   application cpu=1314.48% (user=1354.48% sys=-40.00%)
>   other: cpu=250.67%
>   heap allocation rate 146mb/s
> [000405] user=76.25% sys=-0.54% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-9
> [000457] user=75.54% sys=-1.26% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-14
> [000451] user=73.52% sys= 0.29% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-16
> [000311] user=76.45% sys=-2.99% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-4
> [000389] user=70.69% sys= 2.62% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-6
> [000388] user=86.95% sys=-14.28% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-5
> [000404] user=70.69% sys= 0.10% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-8
> [000390] user=72.61% sys=-1.82% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-7
> [000255] user=87.86% sys=-17.87% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-1
> [000444] user=72.21% sys=-2.30% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-12
> [000310] user=71.50% sys=-2.31% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-3
> [000445] user=69.68% sys=-0.83% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-13
> [000406] user=72.61% sys=-4.40% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-10
> [000446] user=69.78% sys=-1.65% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-11
> [000452] user=66.86% sys= 0.22% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-15
> [000256] user=69.08% sys=-2.42% alloc=     0b/s - SharedPool-Worker-2
> [004496] user=29.99% sys= 0.59% alloc=   30mb/s - CompactionExecutor:15
> [004906] user=29.49% sys= 0.74% alloc=   39mb/s - CompactionExecutor:16
> [010143] user=28.58% sys= 0.25% alloc=   26mb/s - CompactionExecutor:17
> [000785] user=27.87% sys= 0.70% alloc=   38mb/s - CompactionExecutor:12
> [012723] user= 9.09% sys= 2.46% alloc= 2977kb/s - RMI TCP 
> Connection(2673)-127.0.0.1
> [000555] user= 5.35% sys=-0.08% alloc=  474kb/s - SharedPool-Worker-24
> [000560] user= 3.94% sys= 0.07% alloc=  434kb/s - SharedPool-Worker-22
> [000557] user= 3.94% sys=-0.17% alloc=  339kb/s - SharedPool-Worker-25
> [000447] user= 2.73% sys= 0.60% alloc=  436kb/s - SharedPool-Worker-19
> [000563] user= 3.33% sys=-0.04% alloc=  460kb/s - SharedPool-Worker-20
> [000448] user= 2.73% sys= 0.27% alloc=  414kb/s - SharedPool-Worker-21
> [000554] user= 1.72% sys= 0.70% alloc=  232kb/s - SharedPool-Worker-26
> [000558] user= 1.41% sys= 0.39% alloc=  213kb/s - SharedPool-Worker-23
> [000450] user= 1.41% sys=-0.03% alloc=  158kb/s - SharedPool-Worker-17
> 

Reply via email to