off topic for this discussion, and yea, we are in the midst of upgrading...
1.0.8 -> 1.0.12 then to 1.1.0.. then to the latest of 1.1.. then to 1.2.
keep my finger cross for safe upgrading for such a big cluster... we hope
that with cassandra moving some components off heap in 1.1 and 1.2, the
cluster would perform better, at least i do not need to do the user defined
compaction regulary.

thanks guys, jason

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:59 AM, <sean_r_dur...@homedepot.com> wrote:

>  In my experience, you do not want to stay on 1.1 very long. 1.08 was
> very stable. 1.1 can get bad in a hurry. 1.2 (with many things moved
> off-heap) is very much better.
>
>
>
>
>
> Sean Durity – Cassandra Admin, Big Data Team
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert Coli [mailto:rc...@eventbrite.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 2:01 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: sstables remain after compaction
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Jason Wee <peich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob, sorry for the late response, festive season here. cassandra
> version is 1.0.8 and thank you, I will read on the READ_STAGE threads.
>
>
>
> 1.0.8 is pretty seriously old in 2015. I would upgrade to at least 1.2.x
> (via 1.1.x) ASAP. Your cluster will be much happier, in general.
>
>
>
> =Rob
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this Internet Email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this Email
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed
> to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this Email are subject
> to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing The Home
> Depot terms of business or client engagement letter. The Home Depot
> disclaims all responsibility and liability for the accuracy and content of
> this attachment and for any damages or losses arising from any
> inaccuracies, errors, viruses, e.g., worms, trojan horses, etc., or other
> items of a destructive nature, which may be contained in this attachment
> and shall not be liable for direct, indirect, consequential or special
> damages in connection with this e-mail message or its attachment.
>

Reply via email to